The Manager, HSBC Bank Ltd., V/S S.Dinesh, - Consumer Court Case

Karnataka

Bangalore 2nd Additional

CC/2269/2007

S.Dinesh, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, HSBC Bank Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

IP

13 Feb 2008

ORDER

IInd ADDL. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBAN
No.1/7, Swathi Complex, 4th Floor, Seshadripuram, Bangalore-560 020
consumer case(CC) No. CC/2269/2007

S.Dinesh,						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
The Manager, HSBC Bank Ltd.,						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Complainant not present. Defense version filed by the opposite party. Perused the complaint and defense version. The complainant has filed this complaint alleging that, he is getting calls from the opposite party Credit Card Division and he wants the opposite party directed not to disturb him by calling to his mobile phone and he has added his name to do not call register. Looking into the complaint, the complainant cannot be considered as a Consumer. He has not taken any service from the opposite party on payment. However, the counsel for the opposite party submitted that the opposite party has stopped giving calls to the complainant in respect of Credit Card. So, in view of this submission the complainant is not maintainable and it deserves to be dismissed. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, I proceed to pass the following:- ORDER The complaint is dismissed. No order as to costs. Order accordingly, PRESIDENT We concur the above findings. MEMBER MEMBER

Complainant not present. Defense version filed by the opposite party. Perused the complaint and defense version. The complainant has filed this complaint alleging that, he is getting calls from the opposite party Credit Card Division and he wants the opposite party directed not to disturb him by calling to his mobile phone and he has added his name to do not call register. Looking into the complaint, the complainant cannot be considered as a Consumer. He has not taken any service from the opposite party on payment. However, the counsel for the opposite party submitted that the opposite party has stopped giving calls to the complainant in respect of Credit Card. So, in view of this submission the complainant is not maintainable and it deserves to be dismissed. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, I proceed to pass the following:- ORDER The complaint is dismissed. No order as to costs. Order accordingly, PRESIDENT We concur the above findings. MEMBER MEMBER