Orissa

Rayagada

CC/50/2014

Blakrishna Mishra, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, DTDC Courier & Cargo Ltd and Others - Opp.Party(s)

Self

05 Sep 2014

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/50/2014
 
1. Blakrishna Mishra,
Rayagada
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager, DTDC Courier & Cargo Ltd and Others
Rayagada
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

DISTRICT   CONSUMER  DISPUTES REDRESSAL    FORUM, RAYAGADA

          AT:  KASTURI  NAGAR, Ist.  LANE,   L.I.C.OFFICE BACK PO/DIST: RAYAGADA ,  STATE:                                                                   ODISHA,  PIN  NO.765001,  PHONE/FAX                                                                                                                        NO.06856-223025.

                                                                               ....                                      

                                            C.C. Case  No..50/ 2014.

                                          Dated.  11th Sept, 2014.                                   

 P R E S E N T .

Sri Pradeep Kumar Dash, LL.B,                             President.

Smt. Ch.  Nirmala Kumari Raju, LLB,                    Member

Balakrishna Mishra,Balajinagar,11nd Line, Near Uma Sankar theatre, Rayagada, Po/Ps//Dist.Rayagada,,765001.                                                          ……Complainant

                                                            Vrs.

1.         D.T.D.C. Courier & Cargo Ltd., Near Hotel Trupti, Rayagada. Rayagada,

2.         D.T.D.C. Courier & Cargo Ltd., Katepuram Choke,Pimpligurav,Pune-411061.

3.         D.T.D.C. Courier & Cargo Ltd., Regd. Office,No.3,Victoria Road, Bangalore-            560047.                                                                                   ……...Opp.Parties

Counsel for the parties:

For the complainant: In Person

For the O.Ps: Sri N.K. Nayak & Associates Advocate, Bhubaneswar.

                                                            JUDGMENT

1.                     The facts of the complaint  in brief is that,  the complainant has  sent a parcel having Homeopathic medicine worth of Rs.2000/- through the O.P. No.1  on dt.22.10.2013 vide Consignment No.D..14973877 and after lapse of four months  the said consignment was not delivered to the consignee who was at Pane. The complainant again and again contacted with all O.Ps  but no satisfactory answer was received from any corner .   As it was a life saving medicine  it has to be reached with the consignee in time and due to the negligence of the O.ps  the complainant has suffered a lot and also faced a lot of mental agony. The said parcel was neither delivered to the consignee nor it was returned to the complainant  and hence prayed  payment of Rs.2300/-   which is the value of the medicine, parcel charges and packing charges and also prayed to penalize the O.ps for their negligence. Hence, this case.

2.                     After receipt of notice  the Opp.PartyNo.3 appeared through his advocate Sri N.K.Nayak and files written version denying the allegations of the complainant. The O.p No.1 & 2 have not appeared as such they were set exparte.

                        It is admitted by the Opp.Party No.3 that  the complainant had sent some homeopathic medicines worth of Rs.2,000/- which he has declared in the shipper copy and as per the terms and conditions of the contract between the complainant and the O.ps  the liability of the Opp.Party  for any loss and damage to the shipment is Rs.500/-.At this stage the O.p 3 is liable for Rs.500/-  because there are  two other Opp.Parties who are also liable for the same and prayed to  dismiss the complaint  without any compensation and litigation expenses.

                        It is admitted  by both the parties that the parcel in question was not delivered to the consignee for which the O.P No.3 has admitted  in its version to  pay for the  1/3rd  of loss and also submitted that the rest of the Opp.Parties  are also liable  for the loss . Since the O.P 3 has admitted  the allegations of the complainant we do not  feel it necessary to dive deep into the matter. Hence, the complaint is  allowed in part  and we dispose of the matter with the following directions.

                                                            ORDER

                        The petition of the complainant is allowed on contest  against all the O.ps. They are jointly and severally liable to pay  towards the loss  and damages   which caused  mental agony and harassment to the complainant .Hence, the O.Ps are ordered to  pay the cost of medicine Rs.2,000/- Parcel and packing charges of Rs.300/- along with compensation of Rs.10,000/- which includes cost of litigation and mental agony. The mater is disposed with the direction to the Opposite Parties to comply the above order within four weeks of receipt of this ,failing which they are liable to pay penal interest @ 12% p.a. on the above awarded amount till its realization.

                        Pronounced in open forum today on this 11 h day of September,2014 under the seal and signature of this forum.

                         A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements , be forwarded to the parties  free of charge.

 

            Member                                                                       President

Documents relied upon:

By the complainant:

  1. Xerox copy of  Consignee dt.22.10.13.

By the Opp.Party: Nil

 

                                                                                    President

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.