Kerala

Kollam

CC/07/228

Shaji Sugunan, S/o. Sugunan, Mullikkyal Veedu - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, District Telecom,B.S.N.L. - Opp.Party(s)

Sheebanath.S

29 Nov 2008

ORDER


C.D.R.F. KOLLAM : CIVIL STATION - 691013
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM ::: KOLLAM
consumer case(CC) No. CC/07/228

Shaji Sugunan, S/o. Sugunan, Mullikkyal Veedu 		...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

The Manager, District Telecom,B.S.N.L.
Account Officer A.M.Mobile Service Office,Pulimoodu
Telephone Revenue Inspector, G.M.T.D Office, Vellayambalam		 ...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. K. VIJAYAKUMARAN : President 2. RAVI SUSHA : Member

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. The Manager, District Telecom,B.S.N.L. 2. Account Officer A.M.Mobile Service Office,Pulimoodu 3. Telephone Revenue Inspector, G.M.T.D Office, Vellayambalam

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

By Sri. K.Vijayakumaran, President

                          Complainant is absent. Opposite Party  is present. Since the Complainant has been served with intimation by the postal authorities, he is aware of this proceedings and his non-appearance can only be due to the reason that he does not want to prosecute this complaint.

Hence this complaint is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs

 

Dated this the 4th day of December, 2008.




......................K. VIJAYAKUMARAN : President
......................RAVI SUSHA : Member