Punjab

Jalandhar

CC/478/2022

Partap Singh S/o Chet Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager Director/Chairman PSPCL - Opp.Party(s)

Vishal Paruthi

26 Dec 2022

ORDER

Distt Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,
2nd Floor, Room No - 217
JALANDHAR
(PUNJAB)
 
Complaint Case No. CC/478/2022
( Date of Filing : 23 Dec 2022 )
 
1. Partap Singh S/o Chet Singh
H.No 122, Lane No. 6, Bhai BhannoJi Nagar, Jalandhar
jalandhar
PUNJAB
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager Director/Chairman PSPCL
The Mall, Patiala
2. The Chief Engineer, PSPCL
Shakti Sadan, Jalandhar
jalandhar
PUNJAB
3. The Executive Engineer, Commercial Sub. PSPCL Divn.
Sub Divn. No.2, Model Town, Jalandhar
jalandhar
PUNJAB
4. The S.D.O., Commercial Sub Divn,,PSPCL
Model Town, Jalandhar
jalandhar
PUNJAB
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Harveen Bhardwaj PRESIDENT
  Jyotsna MEMBER
  Jaswant Singh Dhillon MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Sh.Vishal Pruthi, Advocate Counsel for Complainant.
......for the Complainant
 
Dated : 26 Dec 2022
Final Order / Judgement

CC/478/2022  

 

Partap Singh Vs PSPCL & Others

 

Present:- Sh.Vishal Pruthi, Adv Counsel for Comlainant.

Office report seen. Heard. Apparently the complainant seems to be a consumer and complaint is within limitation and this Commission has pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction to proceed with the complaint. The same is admitted. Also the the complainant along with his counsel tendered into evidence his duly sworn Affidavit alongwith some documents vide his separate statement.

Alongwith complaint, the complainant has also moved Stay application for directing the opposite parties not to recover any amount as alleged to the tune of Rs.4,33,680/- and further restraining them from disconnecting the electric connection Account No.3004826744 till the final disposal of the present complaint. Let Notice of the complaint as well as stay application be issued to the Opposite Parties No.1 to 4 for 1.2.2023. The Complainant has already deposited amount of Rs.1,00,000/- in the office of the PSPCL/OPs, which is duly accepted by the OPs and same are mentioned in Ex.C-4 i.e. Status Report and Ex.C-5. Certified copy of Account Statement of Complainant. In the meanwhile, OPs are restrained from disconnecting the electric connection of the complainant, subject to deposit of Rs.1,00,000/- in addition to the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- already deposited as referred above within 15 working days. On depositing the said amount of Rs.1,00,000/- the OPs are restrained from recovering any amount to the tune of Rs.4,33,680/-.

 

Member Presiding Member/26.12.2022

 

CC/478/2022  

 

Partap Singh Versus PSPCL & Others

 

Present:- Sh.Vishal Pruthi, Advocate Counsel for Complainant.

 

File put up today on the application filed by Counsel for Complainant for withdrawl of complaint. Statement of S.Partap Singh, Complainant along with Counsel Sh.Vishal Pruthi, Advocate recorded that since the PSPCL/OP has rectified its bill with regard to connection of the Complainant. As such, at this stage, he does not want to proceed with the present complaint and same may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn.

So accordingly, in view of statement suffered by Complainant in Person alongwith his counsel, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. File be consigned to the record room.

 

 

Dated (Jaswant Singh Dhillon) (Jyotsna) (Dr.Harveen Bhardwaj)

12.1.2023 Member Member President

 

 

 

 

 
 
[ Harveen Bhardwaj]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Jyotsna]
MEMBER
 
 
[ Jaswant Singh Dhillon]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.