The Manager, Citicorp Finance India Ltd., V/S C.K. Rajanna, S/o late Kempaiah - Consumer Court Case

Karnataka

Bangalore 2nd Additional

CC/131/2009

C.K. Rajanna, S/o late Kempaiah - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, Citicorp Finance India Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

R.Tharesh

30 Apr 2009

ORDER

IInd ADDL. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBAN
No.1/7, Swathi Complex, 4th Floor, Seshadripuram, Bangalore-560 020
consumer case(CC) No. CC/131/2009

C.K. Rajanna, S/o late Kempaiah						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
The Manager, Citicorp Finance India Ltd.,						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

30/04/2009 An interim order has been passed in this case on 33/01/2009. The opposite party was directed to release the vehicle bearing No. KA-41/3342 in favour of the complainant and the complainant was directed to deposit Rs.50,000/- with opposite party Finance Company. As per the above direction the opposite party had released the vehicle in favour of the complainant on deposit of Rs.50,000/- towards the loan amount by the complainant. Therefore, the complainant has got the relief in view of the interim order. The prayer of the complainant in the main complaint is also to the effect that opposite party be directed to release the Lorry in his favour. Therefore, this prayer has been already granted to the complainant by way of interim order. The learned Advocate for the complainant submitted that the complainant is depositing the EMI with the opposite party Finance Company and the complainant will go on paying loan as per the payment schedule. Therefore, there remains no dispute between the parties. The matter has been settled. The complainant has already got the relief. Hence, the complaint is disposed off and the matter is closed. MEMBER MEMBER PRESIDENT

30/04/2009 An interim order has been passed in this case on 33/01/2009. The opposite party was directed to release the vehicle bearing No. KA-41/3342 in favour of the complainant and the complainant was directed to deposit Rs.50,000/- with opposite party Finance Company. As per the above direction the opposite party had released the vehicle in favour of the complainant on deposit of Rs.50,000/- towards the loan amount by the complainant. Therefore, the complainant has got the relief in view of the interim order. The prayer of the complainant in the main complaint is also to the effect that opposite party be directed to release the Lorry in his favour. Therefore, this prayer has been already granted to the complainant by way of interim order. The learned Advocate for the complainant submitted that the complainant is depositing the EMI with the opposite party Finance Company and the complainant will go on paying loan as per the payment schedule. Therefore, there remains no dispute between the parties. The matter has been settled. The complainant has already got the relief. Hence, the complaint is disposed off and the matter is closed. MEMBER MEMBER PRESIDENT