Orissa

Rayagada

CC/6/2021

Bharat Naik - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, Cholamandalam - Opp.Party(s)

Sri P.N Dash

19 Mar 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT   CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

POST  /  DIST: Rayagada,  STATE:  ODISHA,  Pin No. 765001.

                                                      ******************

C.C.case  No.     6      / 2021.                               Date.     17     . 3. 2021

P R E S E N T .

Sri   Gadadhara  Sahu,                                                      President.

Smt.Padmalaya  Mishra,.                                                 Member

 

Sri Bharat  Naik, S/O: Sira Naik, Resident  of   Near Mangala Mandir Road, ,  Po/Dist: Rayagada. (Odisha).765 001.                             …Complainant.

Versus.

 

1. The  Branch Manager, Cholamandalam Financial Investment Ltd., Rayagada. And 4 others..                                                              .…..Opposite    Parties.

Counsel for the parties:                         

For the complainant: - Sri  P.N.Dash, Advocate.

.For the O.Ps  :- Sri  Rama Prasad Patra, Advocate, Rayagada.

 

JUDGEMENT

The  crux of the case is that  the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps    for not to repossession of  12 wheeler truck bearing Regd. No. CG-16-CF-2092  for which  the complainant  sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.                               

Upon  Notice, the O.Ps put in their appearance and filed  written version through their learned counsel in which  they refuting allegation made against them.  The O.Ps  taking one and another pleas in the written version   sought to dismiss the complaint as it is not maintainable  under the C.P. Act.  The facts which are not specifically admitted may be treated  as denial of the O.Ps. Hence the O.Ps  prays the forum to dismiss the case against  them  to meet the ends of justice.

During the course of hearing the  learned counsel for the complainant has  filed a memo and  submitted that  the complainant  does not want to proceed the above case further  and not interested to proceed  the  case further  and the complainant prays the District Commission  to   close  the case accordingly  as settled out of the court  for the best interest of justice.

  Heard from the parties. During the course of hearing the learned counsel  for  the O.Ps has not objected the memo filed by  the complainant.  Perused  the   record  and  memo  filed by the O.P.  The memo is allowed.

                Accordingly the present dispute mitigated  and the  case stands disposed  off  but O.Ps wriggled out of  liabilities & the  case closed against  them    as  the  complainant   does not want to  proceed  with  the case further against the O.Ps  after settled the matter amicably out of court .    Parties are left  to bear their own cost.

Dictated and corrected by me.       Pronounced on this     17th.    Day of       March, 2021.

               

                                                                                Member.                                             President