NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/4019/2009

R.MUHUKRISHNAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE MANAGER CANARA BANK - Opp.Party(s)

IN PERSON

18 Dec 2009

ORDER

Date of Filing: 30 Oct 2009

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/4019/2009
(Against the Order dated 08/09/2009 in Appeal No. 01/2009 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)
1. R.MUHUKRISHNAN10, Easwaran Nagar HIG-TNHB RamanpuramChennai - 600089 ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. THE MANAGER CANARA BANKCanara Bank, NRI Branch II Floor, 770-A, Anna SalaiChennai - 600002 ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. B.K. TAIMNI ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :IN PERSON
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 18 Dec 2009
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

          The contention of the petitioner/complainant was that in the absence of two members, President and one Member of the District Forum cannot constitute a Bench and decide the case.  We agree with the view taken by the State Commission that in view of Section 14 (2) and 29 (A) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 the District

 

-2-

Forum’s Bench constituted of two members could hear and decide the case.  Dismissed.



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................B.K. TAIMNIMEMBER