Orissa

Rayagada

CC/24/2020

Puspanjali Panda - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, Aristo Pharmco Uticalo Pvt. Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Self

12 Oct 2020

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM RAYAGADA
ODISHA
 
Complaint Case No. CC/24/2020
( Date of Filing : 13 Mar 2020 )
 
1. Puspanjali Panda
Saipriya Nagar, Rayagada
Rayagada
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager, Aristo Pharmco Uticalo Pvt. Ltd.,
Kunbar, Falia Nani Daman-396210
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Padmalaya Mishra PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Gadadhar Sahu MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 12 Oct 2020
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT   CONSUMER  DISPUTES REDRESSAL    FORUM, RAYAGADA,

STATE:  ODISHA.

C.C. Case  No.     24     / 2020.         Dt.  7.10.2020              

 

Puspanjali  Panda, D/O: Smt. Sanjuktarani Panda,  AT:Saipriya Nagar, Radhakrishna Street, Near Govt. Primary  School,   Po: Rayagada,  Dist:Rayagada   (Odisha).  765 001.  Cell No. 9437339030.                                                                                                                      …. Complainant.

Versus.

The Manager, Aristo Pharmaceuticals  Pvt.  Ltd., Survey No.371,Kunbar Falia,Village:Dabhel,  Nani Daman-396 210, Daman (Union  Territory).                                                                                                                           … Opposite parties.

             JUDGEMENT.

The  crux of the case is that  the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps    for  bed smell coming from the Aristogem medicine bottle    for which  the complainant  sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.

The case record taken up today on the strength  of  an advance petition filed by the  complainant... The complainant  also personally present before the forum..  Both the parties are filed a memo stating that  they have compromised their case out of court with the interference of their well wisher and through process of conciliation.  The complainant  is not interested to continue with the case as the matter is settled amicably and the complainant prays the forum to close the case for the best interest of justice.

Both the parties  have been signed mutually i.e. the complainant as well as the O.Ps regarding  their dispute that has been settled out side  of  the forum and now  prayed to close the  case as the dispute has already been settled   by the O.Ps and the complainant does not want to proceed with the case. So prayed to close the above case.

Perused the Memo. Heard from the parties,  as the purpose has already been  served  and the O.Ps are wriggle out of liability of this complaint case.  Accordingly the case is closed.

Dictated and corrected by me.

Pronounced in open forum today on this      7th. day of  October, 2020 under the seal and signature of this forum.

.                                               Member.                                             President I/C.

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Padmalaya Mishra]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Gadadhar Sahu]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.