Kerala

StateCommission

A/476/2018

AMMINI B - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE MANAGER APOLLO MUNICH HEALTH INSURANCE CO.LTD - Opp.Party(s)

JINI J S

10 Aug 2018

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
 
First Appeal No. A/476/2018
( Date of Filing : 03 Aug 2018 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/31/2017 of District Thiruvananthapuram)
 
1. AMMINI B
TC28/302 SEEVELI NAGAR PETTAH TVM
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. THE MANAGER APOLLO MUNICH HEALTH INSURANCE CO.LTD
THAMPANOOR TVM
2. THE MANAGER APOLLO MUNICH HEALTH INSURANCE CO.LTD
BANJARA HILLS HYDRABAD
3. THE MANAGER APOLLO MUNICH HEALTH INSURANCE CO.LTD
GURGAON HARIYANA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SRI.T.S.P.MOOSATH JUDICIAL MEMBER
  SRI.RANJIT.R MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 10 Aug 2018
Final Order / Judgement

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

APPEAL No. 476/2018

JUDGMENT DATED:10.08.2018

(Against order in C.C. 31/2017 of CDRF, Thiruvananthapuram)

 

PRESENT : 

HON’BLE JUSTICE S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN  : PRESIDENT

SRI. T.S.P. MOOSATH                                                         : JUDICIAL MEMBER

APPELLANT:

 

Ammini. B, T.C 28/302, Seeveli Nagar, Kaithamukku, Pettah P.O, Thiruvananthapuram.

 

(By Adv. Jini. J.S)

 

                                                Vs.

RESPONDENTS :

 

  1. The Manager, Apollo Munich Health Insurance Co. Ltd., Opp: SP Grandise, Thampanoor, Thiruvananthapuram.   

 

  1. The Manager, Apollo Munich Health Insurance Co. Ltd., Ground Floor, Srinilaya, Cyber Spazio, Road No. 2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh-500 034.

 

  1. The Manager, Apollo Munich Health Insurance Co. Ltd., iLABS Centre, 2nd and 3rd Floor, Plot No. 404-405, Udyog Vihar, Phase-III, Gurgaon-122 016, Haryana.  

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        

JUDGMENT

HON’BLE JUSTICE S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN  : PRESIDENT

This appeal is filed by the complainant whose complaint was dismissed for default.  Dismissal of the complaint will not debar the complainant in filing a fresh complaint for the same cause of action showing sufficient cause for dismissal of the previous complaint.   In case of delay in filing a fresh complaint, that has also to be explained.  Subject to observations made as above, the appeal is dismissed, as not admitted.

 

JUSTICE S.S. SATHEESACHANDRAN : PRESIDENT

 

T.S.P. MOOSATH    :  JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI.T.S.P.MOOSATH]
JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
[ SRI.RANJIT.R]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.