Telangana

Nalgonda

CC/1/2017

Daida Krishnaiah - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank - Opp.Party(s)

G.Venkat reddy

08 Mar 2017

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM
NALGONDA
 
Complaint Case No. CC/1/2017
 
1. Daida Krishnaiah
H.No.2-10/1, Gandhinagar, Near Church, Miryalguda Town and Mandal
Nalgonda
Telangana
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager, Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank
Housing Board Branch, (Code 6282), H.No.12-42, Vidyanagar, Miryalguda Town and Mandal
Nalgonda
Telangana
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.TIRUMALA RAO PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. K.Vinodh Reddy Member
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 08 Mar 2017
Final Order / Judgement

 

    BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM AT NALGONDA

 

       PRESENT:  SRI D.TIRUMALA RAO,

                       FAC PRESIDENT.

                                                                               

 

                       SRI K.VINODH REDDY,

                       MEMBER.

 

. . .

 

WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH, 2017

 

 

CONSUMER COMPLAINT No. 1 OF 2017

 

Between: 

 

     Daida Krishnaiah S/o Saidulu, Aged: 61 years, Occ: Retd.Employee,

     R/o H.No.2-40/1, Gandhinagar, Near: Church, Miryalguda Town and

     Mandal, Nalgonda District.

                                                                                                         …Complainant.

 

                                        And

 

 

 

     The Manager,  Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank, Housing Board

     Branch (Code: 6282), H.No.12-42, Vidyanagar, Miryalguda Town and

     Mandal, Nalgonda District.

 

                                                                                                  …OPPOSITE PARTY.

 

 

        This complaint coming on before us for final hearing on this day, in the presence of Sri Guduru Srinivas Rao, Advocate for the Complainant, and  on perusing the material papers on record, the Forum passed the following:

 

 

ORDER

 

        Complainant present. Complainant and counsel for the Complainant filed a Memo not pressing the complaint.  Hence, the complaint is dismissed as not pressed.

 

Written and corrected by me and pronounced by us in the open Forum  on this 8th day of March, 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

MEMBER                                                               FAC PRESIDENT

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.TIRUMALA RAO]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.Vinodh Reddy]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.