DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOZHIKODE
PRESENT: Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN, M.Com, LLB : PRESIDENT
Smt. PRIYA.S, BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) : MEMBER
Sri.V. BALAKRISHNAN, M Tech, MBA, LL.B, FIE: MEMBER
Wednesday the 16th day of October 2024
CC.170/2022
Complainant
Muhammed Ameer,
Cheripurath (HO),
Palode. P.O,
Thachanattukara Panchayath,
Mannarkkad,
Palakkad – 678583
(By Adv. Sri. Pavithran. K)
Opposite Parties
- The Manager,
Ample Technologies (P) Ltd,
I Care Authorised Service Provider,
0019a-0020, Hilite Mall,
NH 17, Thondayad Bypass,
Guruvayurappan College. P.O,
Calicut – 673014
- The Managing Director,
Apple India, 19th Floor,
Concorde Tower, Ub City, No.24,
Vittal Maliya Road, Bangalore – 560001
- The Manager,
Fi Infosolutions and Service (P) Ltd,
Ample Service Provider,
Ground Floor, Angels Arcade,
Kadavanthara, Cochin -682020
(OP1 By Adv. Sri. P. Jayabal Memon, Sri. Rajesh. E
OP2 By Adv. Sri. Nandakumar, Smt. Esha Suchak, Sri. Krishna Bhargav, Smt. T. Sunitha)
ORDER
By Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN – PRESIDENT.
This a complaint filed under section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act,2019.
- The first and second opposite parties filed written version denying all allegations and claims made in the complaint. The third opposite party remained ex-parte.
- Today the case is posted for the affidavit of the complainant as last chance. But the complainant remained absent and there is no representation for him. The onus is on the complainant to prove the allegation of deficiency of service. But the complainant failed to let in any evidence to prove the case so as to get an order as prayed for. The complainant is continuously absent and it appears that he is not interested in pursuing the matter. The allegations are not proved.
In the result, the complaint is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Pronounced in open Commission on this, the 16thday of October, 2024.
Date of Filing: 18/07/2022.
Sd/ Sd/- Sd/- PRESIDENT MEMBER MEMBER
APPENDIX
NIL
Sd/ Sd/- Sd/- PRESIDENT MEMBER MEMBER
True Copy,
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
