West Bengal

Howrah

CC/13/429

SASHI KANT PANDEY - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Manager, ACE Teleshop Co. /DDJMPEX - Opp.Party(s)

29 Apr 2014

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH
20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah – 711 101.
(033) 2638-0892; 0512 E-Mail:- confo-hw-wb@nic.in Fax: - (033) 2638-0892
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/429
 
1. SASHI KANT PANDEY
S/O- Sri Rameshwarnath Pandey, 30, G.T Road(N), P.S.- Golabari, Howrah.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Manager, ACE Teleshop Co. /DDJMPEX
The Manager, ACE Teleshop Co. / DDJMPEX, 40/113, C.R. Park, New Delhi – 110 010.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE T.K. Bhattacharya PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. P.K. Chatterjee MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MRS. Smt. Jhumki Saha MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

DATE OF FILING                    :      09-12-2013.

DATE OF S/R                            :      20-01-2014.

DATE OF FINAL ORDER      :     29-04-2014.

 

Sashi Kant Pandey,

son of Sri Rameshwaranath Pandey

of 30,  G.T. Road ( N ), P.S. Golabari,

District – Howrah. -------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLAINANT.

-          Versus   -

The Manager,

ACE  Teleshop Co. / DDJMPX,

40/113, C .R. Park,

New Delhi – 110010.---------------------------------------------------------OPPOSITE PARTY.

                                                P    R    E     S    E    N     T

 

President     :     Shri T.K. Bhattacharya, M.A. LL.B. WBHJS.

Member      :      Shri P.K. Chatterjee.

Member       :     Smt. Jhumki Saha.

                         

                                                 F  I   N   A    L       O   R   D    E     R

 

1.               The instant case was filed by complainant U/S 12 of the C.P. Act, 1986 wherein the complainant has   prayed for direction upon the o.p. to replace the mobile purchased in the 2nd week of June, 2013 which developed various complications since delivery and as the o.p. in spite of repeated requests did not replace the same nor pay back sum of  Rs. 1,200/-, the cost price of the mobile set. 

 

2.               The only point requires determination whether this Forum has territorial jurisdiction to try the complaint ?

 

 

DECISION  WITH   REASONS      :

 

3.      On scrutiny of the record and enclosures it appears that this Forum has no

territorial jurisdiction to entertain this complaint. Presumably, the complainant was attracted through on line advertisement to purchase the set at a price of Rs. 1,200/-.  The business centre of the o.p. is located at 40/113,  C. R. Park, New Delhi – 110010 which is outside the territorial jurisdiction of this  Forum. So the complaint is hit by Section 11(2) of the C.P. Act, 1986. 

 

      Hence,                             

O     R     D      E      R      E        D               

 

      That the C. C. Case No. 429   of 2013 ( HDF 429  of 2013 )  be and the same is dismissed ex parte without costs.

      Supply the copies of the order to the parties, as per rule.

 

DICTATED  &    CORRECTED

BY   ME.  

 

                                                                   

  (    T.K. Bhattacharya  )                                               

  President,  C.D.R.F.,Howrah.       

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE T.K. Bhattacharya]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. P.K. Chatterjee]
MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MRS. Smt. Jhumki Saha]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.