Orissa

Ganjam

CC/83/2016

Sarita Sagari Sarita Sagarika Swain - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Liquidator - Opp.Party(s)

Through Sri Kailash Chandra Panigrahy, Advocate & Associates for the Complainant

12 Sep 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, GANJAM, BERHAMPUR.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/83/2016
( Date of Filing : 22 Nov 2016 )
 
1. Sarita Sagari Sarita Sagarika Swain
Aged about 29 years, D/o - Dr. Prafulla Kumar Swain, Resident of Braja Nagar 2nd lane, Lochapada Road, Brahmapur-1, Dist. Ganjam.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Liquidator
The Bhanjanager Co-Operative Urban Bank Ltd. -cum- Asst. Registrar of Co-Operative Society, At/PO/PS- Aska, Dist - Ganjam.
2. The Registrar of Co-Operative Society
Bhubaneswar, Odisha, Pin - 751001
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Satish Kumar Panigrahi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Saritri Pattanaik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Through Sri Kailash Chandra Panigrahy, Advocate & Associates for the Complainant, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Through Sri Nilanchal Sahu, Advocate & Associates for the Ops, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 12 Sep 2023
Final Order / Judgement

 

DATE OF HEARING: 12.09.2023

                                                DATE OF DISPOSAL: 12.09.2023

 

 

PER:   SMT. SARITRI PATTANAIK, MEMBER (W)

 

            Both parties are found absent today on repeated call and they have not taken any steps also today.

On perusal of case record it is found that, the Complainant has filed this case for deficiency in services rendered by the Opposite Parties. Accordingly the case was admitted on 22.11.2016 by the Commission and notice was also issued to the Ops on the 07.12.2016. On perusal of record it is found that both parties are found absence since 13.11.2019 till today and not taken any steps in any point of time. The complainant probably does not want to proceed in this case any further. In view of above circumstances, the Commission feels to dispose of the case of the complaint.

Hence in the result, the present consumer complaint stands dismissed for non prosecution by the Complainant. No order as to cost.

This case is disposed of accordingly.

The Judgment be uploaded on the www.confonet.nic.in for the perusal of the parties.

A certified copy of this Judgment be provided to all the parties free of cost as mandated by the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 or they may download same from the www.confonet.nic.in to treat the same as if copy of the order received from this Commission.

The file is to be consigned to the record room along with a copy of this Judgment.

 

 

 

Pronounced on 12.09.2023.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Satish Kumar Panigrahi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Saritri Pattanaik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.