Kerala

Kottayam

CC/182/2020

S Pathrose - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Life Insurance Corporation of India - Opp.Party(s)

Prasannakumary V R

07 Apr 2022

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kottayam
Kottayam
 
Complaint Case No. CC/182/2020
( Date of Filing : 10 Nov 2020 )
 
1. S Pathrose
Alby Nivas Thamarasery Colony Kanjiram P O Kottayam
Kottayam
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Life Insurance Corporation of India
Branch No.2 Jeevan Jyothi Star Junction, Kottayam. Represented by its Mananger.
Kottayam
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Prasannakumary V R, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 07 Apr 2022
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM

Dated this the 07th day of April, 2022

 

Present:  Sri. Manulal V.S. President            

         Sri. K.M. Anto, Member

 

C C No.182/2020 (filed on 10-11-2020)

 

Petitioner                                  :    S. Pathrose,

                                                     Alby Nivas,

                                                     Thamarasery Colony,

                                                     Kanjiram P.O.,

                                                     Kottayam.

     (Adv.Prasannakumari V.R.)

 

                                                                   Vs.   

                                     

Opposite party                          :    The Life Insurance Corporation of India,

                                                     Branch No.2,

                                                     Jeevan Jyothi,

                                                     Star Junction, Kottayam.

                                                     Represented by its Manager.               

                                                    (Adv. George Emmanuel Podipara)

 

                                                          O  R  D  E  R

Sri. Manulal V.S. President

             Complainant represented.   Counsel for the complainant submitted that complainant is not pressing the complaint.  A not pressed memo is also filed by the complainant.  Hence the complaint is disposed as not pressed.    

                     

   Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 07th day of April, 2022

          Sri. Manulal V.S. President   Sd/-

          Sri. K.M. Anto, Member        Sd/-

    

                                                                                  By Order 

 

 

                                                                              Assistant Registrar

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.