West Bengal

Kolkata-I(North)

CC/192/2017

Mrs. Indira Banerjee - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Kolkata Municipal Corporation and 2 others - Opp.Party(s)

14 Jun 2017

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata - I (North)
8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.
Web-site - confonet.nic.in
 
Complaint Case No. CC/192/2017
 
1. Mrs. Indira Banerjee
S/o Late Colonel M. K. Banerjee, 1A, Palm Avenue, Flat 4, Kolkata - 700019.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Kolkata Municipal Corporation and 2 others
5, S. N. Banerjee Road, Kolkata - 700013.
2. Mr. Khalil Ahmed, Municipal Commissioner, KMC
5, S. N. Banerjee Road, Kolkata - 700013.
3. Mrs. Rakhi Ganguly, Assessor Collector (South), KMC
5, S. N. Banerjee Road, Kolkata - 700013.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sambhunath Chatterjee PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sk. Abul Answar MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 14 Jun 2017
Final Order / Judgement

Order No.   2    dt.  14/06/2017

The complainant filed the case against Kolkata Municipal Corporation with the allegation that the corporation mutated the holding in the name of fake person and the complainant though owner of the property was not informed regarding the mutation of the property.

The complainant also alleged that fraud practiced by Kolkata Municipal corporation by inserting the name of different persons and the documents retained by Kolkata Municipal Corporation was not genuine one.

From the four corners of the petition it appears that the allegation against the Kolkata Municipal Corporation regarding the assessment of the property for which a proper Forum is there i/e The Assessment Tribunal (K.M.C), the complainant also alleged that fraud was practiced in the name of fictitious person the mutation was made. In order to get the proper relief , the complainant could have filed a Civil Suit before City Civil Court –IX th Bench, Calcutta, seeking her relief. The complainant submitted that there may be delay for adopting such proceeding as mentioned above.

In order to get expeditious relief, the complainant could have filed a Writ Application of under Article 226 of Constitution of India, before the Hon’ble High Court for non-compliance of the redressal of grievances alleged by Kolkata Municipal Corporation.

The complainant has another remedy by filing an application ,  under Article 227 of constitution of India ,seeking direction upon the Assessment Tribunal for expeditious disposal of the grievance of the complainant.

Considering all these aspects, i.e. from the materials on record we do not find any material which attracts the provision as laid down in the C.P Act.

Accordingly, the case is dismissed on limine.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sambhunath Chatterjee]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sk. Abul Answar]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.