Kerala

Palakkad

CC/40/2011

C.Prakash - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Kerala Water Authority - Opp.Party(s)

28 Jul 2011

ORDER

 
CC NO. 40 Of 2011
 
1. C.Prakash
S/o.Chamu, Prakash Bhavan, Perunkunnam, Palakkad. Proprietor of Prakash Fuels, HPP dealer, Marutha Road, Palakkad
Palakkad
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Kerala Water Authority
Branch Office, Office of the Executive Engineer, P.H.Sub Division, Kerala Water Authority, Kalmandapam, Palakkad
Palakkad
Kerala
2. The Assistant Executive Engineer
P.H.Sub Division, Kerala Water Authority, Palakkad - 1
Palakkad
Kerala
3. The Deputy Tahsildar (RR)
Palakkad
Palakkad
Kerala
4. The Village Officer
Palakkad I Village, Palakkad
Palakkad
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONARABLE MRS. Preetha.G.Nair PRESIDING MEMBER
 HONARABLE MRS. Bhanumathi.A.K Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PALAKKAD

Dated this the 28th day of July 2011


 

Present : Smt. Preetha G Nair, Member

: Smt.Bhanumathi.A.K. Member Date of filing: 09/03/2010


 

(C.C.No.40/2011)

C.Prakash,

S/o.Chamu,

Prakash Bhavan, Perunkunnam,

Palakkad – Proprietor of

Prakash Fuels, HPP Dealer,

Marutha Road,

Palakkad - Complainant

(By Adv.Dhananjayan)

V/s

1. The Kerala Water Authority,

Branch Office, Office of the

Executive Engineer,

P.H.Sub Division,

Kerala Water Authority,

Kalmandapam, Palakkad

(By Adv.K.Raghu)

 

2. The Assistant Executive Engineer,

P.H.Sub Division,

Kerala Water Authority,

Palakkad - 1

(By Adv.K.Raghu)


 

3. The Deputy Tahsildar (RR),

Palakkad

(Govt.Pleader)


 

4. The Village Officer,

Palakkad I Village, Palakkad

(Govt.Pleader) - Opposite parties

 

O R D E R

 

By Smt.PREETHA G NAIR, MEMBER


 

Complainant's counsel represented and submitted that no instructions from the complainant. Opposite parties no representation. On 18/5/2011 both parties submitted that chance for settlement. Thereafter five consecutive postings are given for settlement. Matter was not settled. On 2/7/2011 complainant's counsel filed I.A.229/11 for adjournment sufficient reasons made out. Hence I.A.allowed. Thereafter complainant's counsel submitted that matter not settled and posted for the affidavit of complainant. Today complainant not filed affidavit. It seems complainant is not interested in proceeding with the case. Hence, the complaint dismissed for default.

 

Pronounced in the open court on this the 28th day of July 2011.


 

 

Sd/- Smt. Preetha G Nair

Member

Sd/-

Smt. Bhanumathi.A.K.

Member

 
 
[HONARABLE MRS. Preetha.G.Nair]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HONARABLE MRS. Bhanumathi.A.K]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.