Kerala

Ernakulam

CC/14/606

N.VALSON - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY - Opp.Party(s)

ABRAHAM.P. GEORGE

16 Apr 2015

ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
ERNAKULAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/14/606
 
1. N.VALSON
S/O. C.K. NARAYANAN NAMBIAR, PROPRIETOR, CONEX RECORDING COMPANY, ARJUN CHAMBERS, KALATHILPARAMBIL CROSS ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 16.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDHYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004.
2. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
ELECTRICAL SECTION, COLLEGE CLUB ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 11.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. CHERIAN .K. KURIAKOSE PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SHEEN JOSE MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. V.K BEENAKUMARI MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,

ERNAKULAM.

Date of filing : 14/08/2014

Date of Order : 16/04/2015

Present :-

Shri. Cherian K. Kuriakose, President.

Shri. Sheen Jose, Member.

 

C.C. No. 606/2014

Between

     

    N. Valson,

    ::

    Complainant

    S/o. C.K. Narayanan Nambiar,

    Proprietor, Conex Recording

    Company, Arjun Chambers, Kalathilparambil Cross Road,

    Ernakulam, Kochi-16.

    (By Adv. Abraham P. George, Associated Lawyers,

    5A, 2nd Floor J,

    Jewel Arcade, Layam

    Road, Kochi – 11.)

     

    And

     

    1. The Kerala State Electricity Board,

    ::

    Opposite Parties

    Rep. by its Secretary,

    Vydhyuthi Bhavan, Pattom,

    Thiruvananthapuram – 695 004.

    2. Assistant Engineer,

    Kerala State electricity Board,

    Electrical Section, College Club

    Road, Ernakulam, Kochi – 11.

    (Op.pts. by Adv. Ieans

    C. Chamakkala, 1st Floor,

    Prabhath Buildings,

    T.D. Road,

    Cochin – 11.)

    O R D E R

     

    Cherian K. Kuriakose, President.

     

    Complainant absent. Represented. Opposite parties filed version. It is seen that the complaint is regarding the payment of electricity charges and excess billing pertains to a commercial connection. Hence, prima-facie, the O.P. is not maintainable and hence dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

     

    Pronounced in the open Forum on this the 16th day of April 2014.

    Forwarded/By Order, Sd/- Cherian K. Kuriakose,President.

    Sd/- Sheen Jose, Member.

     

     

    Senior Superintendent.

     

     
     
    [HON'BLE MR. CHERIAN .K. KURIAKOSE]
    PRESIDENT
     
    [HON'BLE MR. SHEEN JOSE]
    MEMBER
     
    [HON'BLE MRS. V.K BEENAKUMARI]
    MEMBER

    Consumer Court Lawyer

    Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

    Bhanu Pratap

    Featured Recomended
    Highly recommended!
    5.0 (615)

    Bhanu Pratap

    Featured Recomended
    Highly recommended!

    Experties

    Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

    Phone Number

    7982270319

    Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.