CC.No.521/2018

Dated:14.05.2018

            Perused the complaint and the documents filed by the complainant and do not discloses the consumer relationship with O.P and further prima–facie he do not disclose deficiency in service on the part of the O.P and there is no unfair trade practice played by the O.P. Further no application has been filed to condone the delay, since the purchase of the industrial shed is in the year 2001 and now after lapse of more than 17 years, the complainant has come up alleging deficiency in service. No proper explanation has been offered. Hence the complaint is devoid of merits and barred by limitation to entertain under the Consumer Protection Act. Hence complaint is hereby rejected.