West Bengal

Dakshin Dinajpur

CC/1/2016

Joygopal Bhaduri - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Infinity Enterprises of Khasra No-10973/3,Gali No.8 Main Firm Road Vill-Kapashera near Falad Na - Opp.Party(s)

Pradipta Kiran Sarkar

21 Jan 2016

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Dakshin Dinajpur, Balurghat, West Bengal
Old Sub jail Market Complex, 2nd Floor, P.O. Balurghat, Dist. Dakshin Dinajpur Pin-733101
 
Complaint Case No. CC/1/2016
 
1. Joygopal Bhaduri
S/o-Late Dinendra Kr. Bhaduri Vill-Mongalpur, P.O & P.S-Balurghat, Dist-Dakshin Dinajpur
Dakshin Dinajpur
West Bengal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Infinity Enterprises of Khasra No-10973/3,Gali No.8 Main Firm Road Vill-Kapashera near Falad Naia City Delhi,State Delhi,Pin-110037
The Infinity Enterprises of Khasra No-10973/3,Gali No.8 Main Firm Road Vill-Kapashera near Falad Naia City Delhi,State Delhi,Pin-110037
2. The Micromax Service Centre, Upendra Bhawan Opposite Purbasha Club Public Bus Stand, P.O & P.S-Balurghat,Dist-Dakshin Dinajpur Pin No.-733101,West Bengal
The Micromax Service Centre, Upendra Bhawan Opposite Purbasha Club Public Bus Stand, P.O & P.S-Balurghat,Dist-Dakshin Dinajpur Pin No.-733101,West Bengal
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sambhunath Chatterjee PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. Swapna saha Lady Member
 HON'BLE MR. Siddhartha Ganguli MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:Pradipta Kiran Sarkar, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

C.C. No.: 1 /2016

Order  No. 3

Dt. 21.1.2016

 

The case is taken up for admission. Perused the complaint. Heard the Ld. Lawyer for the complainant who submits that the complainant purchased a mobile phone of Micromax through online and after receiving the said mobile phone some defects arose and the service centre provided the service to the complainant. On the basis of the said fact that the Ld. Lawyer submits that since cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this Forum, therefore, it is fit case to issue notice upon the OPs.

 

On perusal of the petition as well as documents annexed with the complaint it appears that the deal was made with a firm situated in New Delhi and delivery was made through courier and the service centre i.e. OP No. 2 had no role to play in the said deal. As per section 11 of CP Act, no cause of action arose within jurisdiction of this Forum. Moreover, the status of OP No.2 does not fall within provision u/s 2(q) of the CP Act. In view of the said fact that we do not find that this Forum has any jurisdiction to entertain this case. Accordingly, the complaint is rejected with the observation to re-file the same in proper Forum.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sambhunath Chatterjee]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MS. Swapna saha]
Lady Member
 
[HON'BLE MR. Siddhartha Ganguli]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.