Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/72/2017

S.Manimaran - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Indian Bank, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. Senthamil Selvan

06 Jun 2022

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                        PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

C.C. No.72/2017

DATED, THE 06^TH DAY OF JUNE 2022

Mr. S. Manimaran,

S/o. Mr. D. Sambandam,

G1, Anbalayam,

Plot No.1, S.M.S. Nagar,

Usuppur,

Ammapettai (Post),

Chidambaram (Tk.),

Cuddalore District.                                                                               .. Complainant.

                                                       - Versus –

 

1. The Indian Bank,

Represented by its Chairman and Managing Director,

Corporate Office,

Indian Bank,

Nos.254-260, Avvaishanmugam Salai,

Chennai – 600 014.

 

2. The Branch Manager,

Indian Bank,

No.71, South Car Street,

Chidambaram,

Cuddalore District – 608 001.                                                       .. Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for the complainant                            : M/s. S. Senthamil Selvan

Counsel for the opposite parties 1 & 2            : M/s. Anand

 

This consumer complaint coming up before us on 06.06.2022 for appearance of the complainant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                      

 

 

 

 

Docket Order

 

No representation for the complainant. Opposite parties 1 & 2 present.  The Counsel for the opposite parties 1 & 2 represented that he is ready for arguments.  There was no representation for the complainant for the past several hearings.

Today, this matter is posted for appearance of the complainant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal.  

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M. there was no representation for the complainant.  Hence, the matter was passed over and again called at 12.30 P.M. still there was no representation for the complainant  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the consumer complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the consumer complaint is dismissed for default.   No cost.

 

 

               Sd/-                                                                                     Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                         R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                         PRESIDENT