Kerala

Palakkad

CC/116/2019

Adam Muhammed - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Head Master - Opp.Party(s)

20 Oct 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PALAKKAD
Near District Panchayath Office, Palakkad - 678 001, Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/116/2019
( Date of Filing : 16 Apr 2019 )
 
1. Adam Muhammed
S/o. Moideen, Adam Garden,Vazhukkappara , Mundoor (PO), Palakkad -678 592
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Head Master
A.U.P. School, Vallikkode (PO), Muttikulangara, Palakkad - 678 594
2. The Assistant Education Officer Palakkad
Koppam, Palakkad.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Vinay Menon.V PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Vidya A MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 20 Oct 2021
Final Order / Judgement

 DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PALAKKAD

Dated this the 20th  day of October   2021

Present   : Sri.Vinay Menon.V  President

                : Smt.Vidya.A, Member                                                                           Date of Filing: 16/04/2019

CC/116/2019

Adam Muhammed.V.M.

S/o.Moideen

Adam Garden, Vazhukkapara

Mundoor (PO), Palakkad – 678 592

(By Party in Person)                                                                        -                       Complainant

                                                                                                Vs

1. The Head Master

    A.U.P.School,  Vallikkode (PO),

    Muttikulangara, Palakkad – 678 594

(By Adv.Rajesh Panangad)

2.The Assistant Educational Officer Palakkad

   Koppam, Palakkad                                                       -                       Opposite parties  

O R D E R

By Sri.Vinay Menon. V.,  President

 

The complainant seeks to avail amounts that had become  due to him upon his retirement. Admittedly he retired on 2011, March 31. The amount became due on 1/4/2011. This complaint was filed on 16/4/2019. After deducting  a period of one year  the complainant might have spent in making enquiries, the cause of action must end atleast by 01/04/2014. 

That being so, this complaint is grossly barred by limitation. No explanation as to the cause of delay is also forthcoming.

Hence the complaint is dismissed as grossly barred by limitation by over 5 years.

    Pronounced in the open court on this the 20th   day of October     2021.

                                                                                        Sd/-

                                                                               Vinay Menon V

                                                 President

  Sd/-

 Vidya.A

                    Member   

NB : Parties are directed to take back all extra set of  documents submitted in the

         proceedings in accordance with Consumer Protection (Consumer Commission

         procedure) Regulations, 2020 failing which they will be weeded out after 30 days of

         issuance of the order.  

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Vinay Menon.V]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Vidya A]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.