Telangana

StateCommission

FA/183/2014

Mr. Y. Rajaswar Rao, Son of Y.Vaikuntam, Aged 45 Occ Business, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The HDFC Bank Ltd., Rep. by its Authorised officer - Opp.Party(s)

M.s.A.S. Samudrala

21 Jun 2017

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Telangana
 
First Appeal No. FA/183/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated 08/08/2013 in Case No. CC/629/2012 of District Hyderabad-II)
 
1. Mr. Y. Rajaswar Rao, Son of Y.Vaikuntam, Aged 45 Occ Business,
R.o. 15.2.585, Maharaj Gunj, Hyderabad, AP
2. 2. Smt. Y. Shobha Rani, Wife of Y. Rajeswar Rao, Aged 41 Years, Occ House wife,
R.o.15.2.585, Maharaj Gunj, Hyderabad, AP
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. The HDFC Bank Ltd., Rep. by its Authorised officer
Ranigunj Branch, Secunderabad
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri. PATIL VITHAL RAO JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 21 Jun 2017
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : HYDERABAD.

 

FA NO. 183 OF 2014 AGAINST CC NO. 629 OF 2012

ON THE FILE OF DISTRICT FORUM – II, HYDERABAD

 

Between :

  1. Mr.Y.Rajeswar Rao, S/o.Y.Vaikuntam,

Aged: 45, Occ: Business,

 

  1. Smt.Y.Shobha Rani, W/o.Y.Rajeswar Rao,

Aged: 41, Occ: Housewife,

 

Both R/o.15-2-585, Maharajgunj,

Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh.

…Appellants / Complainants

AND :

The HDFC Bank Ltd.,

Rep. by its Authorized Officer,

Ranigunj Branch,

Secunderabad.

          …Respondent/O.P.

 

 

                                                          

Counsel for the Appellants/Complainants : M/s.A.R.Samudrala, Advocate

 

Counsel for the Respondent/Appellant  : Mr.N.Sudershan, Advocate

                                                                   

                                                    

 

Hon’ble Sri Justice B.N.Rao Nalla   …     President

&

Sri Patil Vithal Rao  …           Member

 

Wednesday, the Twenty First day of June,

Two Thousand Seventeen

 

Oral Order : (Per Hon’ble Justice Sri. B.N.Rao Nalla, President).

 

                                                           ***

      This is an appeal preferred by the Appellants/Complainants praying this Commission to allow the appeal by modifying the order dated 08.08.2013 in C.C.No.629/2012 on the file of District Forum-II, Hyderabad, in the interest of the justice.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             

    

      No representation for Appellants.  Counsel for Respondent present.  In view of the docket orders dated 12.04.2017, the appeal was ordered to be posted under dismissal caption.  Today also there is no representation on behalf of the Appellants.  It seems that the Appellants are either not diligent or they does not want to proceed with the appeal any further.  Hence the appeal is dismissed for default.

 

                                                                        

      PRESIDENT               MEMBER                  Dt: 21.06.2017

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri. PATIL VITHAL RAO]
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.