Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

CC/160/2015

R.Vijayakumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Haddows Club - Opp.Party(s)

Party In Person

20 Jun 2017

ORDER

                                                                       Complaint presented on:  13.10.2015

                                                                          Order pronounced on:  20.06.2017

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (NORTH)

    2^nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

PRESENT: THIRU.K.JAYABALAN, B.Sc., B.L.,        PRESIDENT

                    TMT.T.KALAIYARASI, B.A.B.L.:           MEMBER II

 

TUESDAY THE 20^th  DAY OF JUNE 2017

 

                                      C.C.NO.160/2015

 

 

R.Vijayakumar,

S/o Ranganathan,

No.13/A, Kamarajar Street,

Vinayagapuram,

Villivakkam,

Chennai – 600 099.

                                                                                   ..... Complainant

 

                                     ..Vs..

 

 

The Haddows Club,

Also known as,

The Haddows Country Club,

Represented by its

General Manager and Joint Secretary,

No.6 Kvsh Kumar Road,

Nungambakkam, Chennai – 34.

 

                                                                            …..Opposite party    

 

 

 

 

                                                         

Date of complaint                                              :12.11.2015

Counsel for complainant                         :Party in person

Counsel for  Opposite Party                   : M/s N.Rajasenthoorpandian,

                                                                     C.Subramanian, K.Manikandan,

                                                                      S.V.R.Subramaniam, R.Saranya

 

O R D E R

 

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. K.JAYABALAN B.Sc., B.L.,

No representation for  the Complainant. The Complainant has not filed proof affidavit from 14.03.2017 for 16 hearings. Today also the case is posted for the filing of the proof affidavit of the Complainant as last chance and no further adjournment. However, the Complainant neither represented by his counsel nor filed proof affidavit till 4.00 p.m. The Complainant also called absent till then. The non-filing of proof affidavit of the Complainant shows that even after posted today as last chance that the Complainant has no interest in prosecuting the case. Hence, the Complaint is dismissed for default for non-filing of proof affidavit and for non prosecuting. No costs.

                 Pronounced by us on this 20^th   day of June 2017.

 

      -sd-                                                                                 -sd-     

MEMBER – II                                                              PRESIDENT