West Bengal

Purba Midnapur

CC/05/2012

Sri Ranjit Kar - Complainant(s)

Versus

The General Manager(SBI) - Opp.Party(s)

05 Apr 2012

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PURBA MEDINIPUR
ABASBARI, P.O. TAMLUK, DIST. PURBA MEDINIPUR,PIN. 721636
TELEFAX. 03228270317
 
Complaint Case No. CC/05/2012
( Date of Filing : 02 Mar 2012 )
 
1. Sri Ranjit Kar
S/o Lt. Kamal Krishna Kar, Vill.:Usmanpur, P.O.: Math Chandipur P.S.: Chandipur Dist.: Purba Medinipur Now residing at: Vill.: Kalikhali P.O.: Math Chandipur P.S.: Chandipur
Purba Medinipur
West Bengal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The General Manager(S.B.I.)
State Bank of India, Local Head Office Customer Grievance Redressal Cell, Samiruddhi Bhawan 1, Strand Road, Kolkata 700001
Kolkata
West Bengal
2. The General Manager (State Bank og India)
State Bank of India, Local Head Office Loan Sanction Samiruddhi Bhawan 1, Strand Road, Kolkata 700001
Kolkata
West Bengal
3. The Manager
State Bank of India Khodambari S.A.E. Purba Medinipur PIN.: 721650
Purba Medinipur
West Bengal
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 05 Apr 2012
Final Order / Judgement

Hazira is filed on behalf of the complainant.

Heard ld. Advocate for the complainant with regard to admission hearing of this case.

The complainant has filed this case praying for an order for getting back the documents submitted before the OP Bank for sanctioning loan by the bank, as also for compensation of Rs. 1 lakh on the principle ground that loan of Rs. 17,63,860 was sanctioned, but the said loan was not disbursed in favour of the complainant rather, the original documents of the complainant lying in the custody of the OP have not been returned.

Perused the complaint and the Xerox copies of documents filed by the complainant on record.  It is to be noted that no document is produced on behalf of the complainant to show as to alleged sanction of any loan in favour of the complainant.  The complainant also has not filed any such paper or document to show that the documents in question are lying in the custody of the OP bank.

It further appears from the annexure P-14 [copy of judgment dt. 08-07-2011 of the Hon’ble High Court in relation to W.P. No. 10919 (W) of 2011] that the said writ petition, filed against the said bank by this complainant with similar nature of prayer, was dismissed by the Hon’ble Court.

Under the circumstances we feel that the instant complaint is liable to be dismissed since the same is not maintainable.

Hence, it is

Ordered

          that the instant complaint case be and the same is dismissed being not maintainable.

 

S.S. Ali                                                A.K. Bhattacharyya

Member                                               President

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.