Orissa

Ganjam

CC/31/2015

Sri Brundabana Mohapatra - Complainant(s)

Versus

The General Manager - Opp.Party(s)

Sri N. Tripathy & Associates

03 Dec 2015

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, GANJAM,
BERHAMPUR
 
Complaint Case No. CC/31/2015
 
1. Sri Brundabana Mohapatra
S/o. Lt. Ganesh Mohapatra, Village.Purusottampur, P.O. Badhiaosta, P.S. Pattapur
Ganjam
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The General Manager
Telecom District (BSNL), Telephone Bhawan, Berhampur -1
Ganjam
2. The S. D. O, B.S.N.L
Holding Office at Digapahandi
Ganjam
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MS. Soubhagyalaxmi Pattnaik PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Minati Pradhan MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. N. Tuna Sahu MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:Sri N. Tripathy & Associates , Advocate
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

DATE OF FILING: 6.11.2015

 DATE OF DISPOSAL: 3.12.2015.

Miss S.L.Pattnaik, President.

                       Brief fact of the case of the complainant is that he gave his house on rent basis to Opposite Parties and prayed this Forum to direct the O.Ps to vacate the house of the complainant immediately, to pay the house rent @Rs.2000/- per month from the month of August 2013 to till date, to pay the electric consumption arrear dues till date etc.

            2. Prima facie, the facts as stated in the complaint petition do not raise any consumer disputes. The complainant being a tenant under the O.Ps land lord, the dispute raised by him does not come within the scope of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. This Forum by relying upon a citation passed by the National Commission, New Delhi in Smt. Laxmi Singhania versus Smt. Rani Devi Lohia & Another 1992(1) CPR  109 that  a complaint relating to dispute between landlord and tenant does not come within the purview of the Consumer Protection Act.  In the light of the above legal position, we are of the opinion the complaint petition is not entertainable by this Redressal Forum. If so advised, the complainant may have his remedy in the Civil Court having jurisdiction. Hence the complaint petition is not admitted and is dismissed in limine.

            Copy of the order be supplied to the complainant on free of cost. 

 
 
[HON'BLE MS. Soubhagyalaxmi Pattnaik]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Minati Pradhan]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. N. Tuna Sahu]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.