Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

204/2003

Ajith Kumar.M - Complainant(s)

Versus

The General Manager - Opp.Party(s)

Vettoor S.Prakash

31 Oct 2009

ORDER


Thiruvananthapuram
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Vazhuthacaud
consumer case(CC) No. 204/2003

Ajith Kumar.M
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

The General Manager
Administrative Officer(TR)
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. Smt. Beena Kumari. A 2. Smt. S.K.Sreela 3. Sri G. Sivaprasad

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

PRESENT

SRI. G. SIVAPRASAD : PRESIDENT

SMT. BEENAKUMARI. A : MEMBER

SMT. S.K.SREELA : MEMBER

O.P. No. 204/2003

Dated : 31.10.2009

Complainant:

Ajith Kumar. M, S/o Mani, T.C 12/1417, BLRA-20, Brigadiar Lane 20, Vikas Bhavan Post, Thiruvananthapuram-33.


 

(By adv. Vettoor S. Prakash)

Opposite parties:

          1. The General Manager, Telecom, B.S.N.L Mobile Services, Thiruvananthapuram.

             

          2. Administrative Officer, (TR), CMTS, O/o General Manager, Mobile Services, CGMT Annex Buildings, Thiruvananthapuram-33.

             

(By adv. G.S. Prakash)


 

ORDER

Since the dispute is in connection with the Telegraph Act, the remedy under Consumer Protection Act is barred in the light of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide order dated 01.09.2009 in Civil Appeal No. 7687 of 2004 between General Manager, Telecom & M. Krishnan & others. In view of the above, complaint is dismissed as not maintainable. Complainant is at liberty to seek redress from appropriate authority. G. SIVAPRASAD,

President.

BEENAKUMARI. A : MEMBER


 

S.K. SREELA : MEMBER

 




......................Smt. Beena Kumari. A
......................Smt. S.K.Sreela
......................Sri G. Sivaprasad