View 7801 Cases Against Transport
P.Senthilkumar, filed a consumer case on 11 Jul 2016 against The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, in the North Chennai Consumer Court. The case no is 78/2013 and the judgment uploaded on 12 Aug 2016.
Complaint presented on : 28.03.2013
Order pronounced on : 11.07.2016
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (NORTH)
2nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3
PRESENT: THIRU.K.JAYABALAN, B.Sc., B.L., : PRESIDENT
TMT.T.KALAIYARASI, B.A.B.L., : MEMBER II
MONDAY THE 11th DAY OF JULY 2016
C.C.NO.78/2013
P.Senthil Kumar,
S/o.P.Padmanaban,
No.3/185/7E. Kamatchi Avenue,
Kannadasan Nagar,
Thiruvallur – 602 001.
..... Complainant
..Vs..
1.The General Manager, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation, Villupuram – 605 602.
|
| |
2. The General Manager, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation, Salem – 636 007. …..Opposite Parties |
|
Date of complaint 05.04.2013
Counsel for Complainant : M/s.R.Aravindh Kumar
Counsel for 1st Opposite party :G.Palani
Counsel for 2nd Opposite Party :K.RaviKumar
O R D E R
BY PRESIDENT THIRU. K.JAYABALAN B.Sc., B.L.,
This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.
1. THE COMPLAINT IN BRIEF:
The Complainant is residing at Thiruvallur from the year 2009. He used to travel regularly from Thiruvallur to Koyambedu by utilizing the services of the Opposite Parties bus. They have two routes to reach Koyambedu from Poonamallee, one is viz Poonamallee-Porur –Guindy-Koyambedu covering 24 kms charging ticket Rs.14/- and the other is Poonamallee –Maduravoyal -Koyambedu covering 16 kms charging ticket Rs.9/-. Due to the implementation of the Metro Rail Project, the Opposite Parties bus were not operating through Porur, Guindy and the same are plying in the Maduravoiyal route. The Maduravoyal route is 8 kms less and the fare is also Rs.5/- less than the Porur, Guindy route. Approximately 200 buses are plying in the Maduravoyal route within a span of 10 hours and 5,000 – 10,000 public are utilizing services of the Opposite Parties and hence roughly about a sum of Rs. 50,000/- is collected excess per day from public. The route Poonamallee- Maduravoyal- Koyambedu the ticket is charged at Rs.14/- i.e excess of Rs.5 per ticket than the actual ticket cost of Rs.9/- is illegal and higher than the normal fare . The Complainant is being the regular traveler has to loose Rs.10/- per day to travel from Poonamallee to Koyambedu and return. Approximately during the period November 2011 to till date he would have travelled 200 times and accordingly he would have sustained a loss of Rs.2,000/- by paying excess charge of Rs.5/- per ticket. The Opposite Parties are collecting excess fare for enriching themselves. The illegal act of charging excess ticket fare is nothing but an unfair trade practice and thereby caused mental agony to the Complainant by committing Deficiency in Service. Hence the Complainant filed this Complaint to reimburse the sum of Rs.2,000/- for utilizing the service and compensation for mental agony with cost of the Complaint.
2. WRITTEN VERSION OF THE 1st OPPOSITE PARTY IN BRIEF:
The bus fares of the Opposite Parties have been fixed by the Government and the same is revised by the Government through various G.O’s. The Complainant allegation that the Opposite Party enriched by collecting additional fare is baseless. Each route fare has been fixed and the same is increased or decreased only by the Government. In many cases the Corporation Buses were redirected with changing of routes by the Government or by the Police Authority. However, in such circumstances the corporation has no authority to increase the fare and collected the same. The allegation that he has regularly travelled from Thiruvallur to Koyambedu is a self servicing statement without any documentary proof. In fact, no transport corporation authorities or employees forced the Complainant to bear the additional expenditure when many buses were operated with ordinary fare from Tiruvallur to Koyembedu via Maduravoyal. In fact, the Complainant whose destination is Koyembedu from Tiruvallur has saved much time to reach Koyembedu via Maduravoyal as was the case of the other general public who has shown satisfaction in traveling the buses operated by the Opposite Parties herein at the instruction and direction of the government. As already stated, the transport corporation cannot penalize the general public when the prescribed route has been diverted for temporary reason if any operating kilometers have been increased, since the same has to be done by the Government and similarly for temporary reason of divert of route which minimize the operation of bus into a less kilometers, the transport corporation cannot reduce the bus fare for all of a sudden without the permission of the government. This Opposite Party never adopted any unfair trade practice and committed any Deficiency in Service and therefore prays to dismiss the Complaint.
3. WRITTEN VERSION OF THE 2nd OPPOSITE PARTY IN BRIEF:
The 2nd Opposite Party is operating buses only in the permitted route i.e Poonamallee – Porur-Guindy – Koyambedu, The 2nd Opposite Party is not operating buses through Poonamalle- Maduravoyal – Koyambedu. The 2nd Opposite Party is not collecting any excess fare. The 2nd Opposite Party is collecting only the correct fare. The 2nd Opposite Party is operating only 6 buses in the Poonamallee – Porur – Guindy –Koyambedu route. The Complaint that the 2nd Opposite Party operating buses in Poonamallee – Maduravoyal –Koyambedu and clandestinely collecting excess amount from the general public are all false and imaginative and the Complainant is put to strict proof of the same. The allegation that the 1st and 2nd Opposite Parties gained a huge sum of Rs.2,00,00,000/- illegally is utter false and imaginative without any base. The 2nd Opposite Party has not collected a single penny from this Complainant or from anybody else illegally. This Opposite Party has not committed any Deficiency in Service and prays to dismiss the Complaint.
4. POINTS FOR CONSIDERATION:
1. Whether there is deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties?
2. Whether the complainant is entitled to any relief? If so to what relief?
5. POINT NO :1
According to the Complainant there are two routes to reach Koyambedu from Poonamalle one is viz Poonamallee – Porur -Guindy- Koyambedu covering 24 kms with a ticket charges of Rs.14/- and the other route is Poonamallee- Maduravoyal-Koyambedu covering 16 kms with a ticket charge of Rs.9/- and due to implementation of Metro Rail Project in the Porur - Guindy route, all the buses plying on the said route are diverted and plying the other alternate Maduravoyal route and however the Maduravoyal route fare is Rs.9/- was not collected for the Porur - Guindy route buses while plying in the Maduravoyal route, instead they charged a sum of Rs.14/- towards ticket charges by excess of Rs.5/- and therefore the Opposite Parties committed unfair trade practice by collecting excess of Rs.5/- Per ticket.
6. Ex.A2 is the RTI reply furnished by the 1st Opposite Party to the Complainant and in the said reply admits the allegations of the Complainant that in respect of both the routes distance and fares and difference fare of Rs.5/- are as stated above.
7. The main contention of Opposite Parties is that the Government only fixed the fares and therefore to modify or revise the fares the same could be done only by the Government and not by the Transport Corporation. Ex.B1 is the Government Order fixing fares of the Transport Corporation for various stages. In the said order the Governor of Tamil Nadu issues directions to the State Transport Authority and the Original Transport Authority regarding the fixation of fares to guide the transport authorities the stage wise fares have also been fixed by the Government in the G.O itself. Based on that G.O Transport Authority shall fix the fares stage wise. Therefore as per the G.O the State Transport Authority are fixing the fares based on the directions issued in Ex.B1 Government Order. Therefore as contended by the Opposite Parties the transport authority has no right to raise or reverse or modify the fares while the buses are plying subsidiary routes, since the destination or terminal point are one and the same. The Government alone is competent to alter the fares. Admittedly the Complainant did not approach the Government to modify or alter the fares while plying in a subsidiary route. Further the Complainant also has not added the Government as a party in the Complaint. Therefore in view of the forgoing discussions the Complainant did not represent his grievances to the Government and also not added the Government as a party to this proceedings and further the Opposite Parties are not competent to reverse the fares excepting the Government, we hold that the Opposite Parties have not committed any unfair trade practice and thereby committing Deficiency in Service and accordingly this point is answered.
8. POINT NO :2
Since the Opposite Parties have not committed any Deficiency in Service, the Complainant is not entitled for any relief in this Complaint and the Complaint is liable to be dismissed without cost.
In the result the Complaint is dismissed. No costs.
Dictated to the Steno-Typist transcribed and typed by her corrected and pronounced by us on this 11th day of July 2016.
MEMBER – II PRESIDENT
LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED BY THE COMPLAINANT:
Ex.A1 dated NIL Bus Tickets
Ex.A2 dated NIL RTI Reply
Ex.A3 dated 07.01.2013 Legal Notice sent by the Complainant
Ex.A4 dated NIL Acknowledgement card
Ex.A5 dated 05.04.2013 Reply Notice by Opposite Parties
LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED BY THE 1st OPPOSITE PARTY :
Ex.B1 dated 17.11.2011 G.O.M.S.No.783
Ex.B2 dated 05.04.2013 Reply legal notice of 1st Opposite Party with
acknowledgement card.
LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED BY THE 2nd OPPOSITE PARTY :
…..NIL……
MEMBER – II PRESIDENT
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.