BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PONDICHERRY

C.C.No. 54/2017

Dated this the 24^th day of August, 2018

(Date of Institution: 12.1.2018)

C. Sendhil Kumar son of (late) Chakarapani,

Hindu, aged about 44 years,

Residing at No.19, I-Main Street,

Bharadhidasan Nagar,

Mudaliarpet, Pondicherry – 605 004                    ...         Complainant

Vs.

1. The General Manager (Sales & Marketing)

            Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd.,

            2^nd, 3^rd, 4^th floor, tower-C,

            Vipul tech Square, Sector-43,

            Golf Course Road, Gurgaon,

            Haryana – 122002

2. The Proprietor,

            Mani Electronics

            271/2, Maraimalai Adikal Salai,

            Puducherry – 605001

3. The Proprietor,

            TVS Electronics Ltd.,

            58-A, 1^st Floor, Villianur Main Road,

            Pavazha Nagar, Reddiyarpalayam,

            Puducherry-605010                                     …        Opposite Parties

BEFORE:

            THIRU A.ASOKAN, B.A., B.L.,

            PRESIDENT 

THIRU V.V. STEEPHEN, B.A., LL.B., 

           MEMBER

Tmt. D. KAVITHA, B.A., LL.B., 

           MEMBER

FOR THE COMPLAINANT                       :  Thiru S. Ganesh Gnanasambanthan, Advocate

FOR THE OPPOSITE PARTIES :     M/s. V.V. Giridhar, P. Suresh, S. Vimala,

                                                                                    Advocates for O.P.1

                                                                                    O.Ps.2 and 3 remained exparte

O R  D  E  R

This is a complaint filed by the complainant under Section 12(3) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying to direct the opposite parties to pay to the complainant a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- for defective TV sold to the complainant and to pay Rs.20,000/- as compensation towards the negligence, carelessness and inordinate delay, insufficiency in service and to pay Rs.25,000/- for unfair trade practice, mental agony, pain and sufferings and stress along with Rs.3,000/- being the cost of this legal notice totaling to Rs.1,48,000/- and to replace the defective TV with a new one and to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- for costs of the complaint and other reliefs.

2.         Disputing the complaint, the first opposite party filed the reply version.   Opposite parties 2 and 3 were called absent set exparte.   The complainant was examined as CW1 and Ex.C1 to Ex.C8 were marked.

3.         Today this complaint was called.  Complainant present.   Counsel present.  Opposite party absent.   Counsel present.   Complainant filed memo of compromise and memo of withdrawing the complaint.    In view of the memo, this complaint is hereby dismissed.   No cost.   The memo of compromise and the memo for withdrawing the complaint shall form part and parcel of this order.    

Dated this the 24^th day of August, 2018.

1.  ASOKAN)

PRESIDENT

(V.V. STEEPHEN)

MEMBER

(D. KAVITHA)

MEMBER

COMPLAINANT'S WITNESSES:

Cw1 – 2.5.2018 – C. Sendhil Kumar

OPPOSITE PARTIES WITNESSES:      NIL

COMPLAINANT'S EXHIBITS:

Ex.C1 – 30.10.2014 – Cash Bill issued by Mani Electronics

Ex.C2 – 11.3.2016 – Estimation confirmation issued by 3^rd opposite party to

the complainant

Ex.C3 – 18.3.2016 – Complaint  lodged by the complainant to opposite

party by e-mail

Ex.C4 – 30.05.2016 – Lawyers notice issued by the complainant to the

opposite parties

Ex.C5 – 4.6.2016 – A/d. card signed by the first opposite party

Ex.C6 – 3.6.2016 – A/d. card signed by the second opposite party

Ex.C7 – 8.6.2016 – Returned RPAD Cover sent to the third opposite party as

Unclaimed

Ex.C8 – 30.10.2014 – Warranty card issued  by 2^nd opposite party

OPPOSITE PARTIES EXHIBITS:                   NIL

LIST OF MATERIAL OBJECTS:          NIL

1. ASOKAN)

                  PRESIDENT

                (V.V. STEEPHEN)

                         MEMBER

                (D. KAVITHA)

      MEMBER