Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/111/2016

Sri Samsan Mohapatra, aged 38 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

The General Manager, NESCO, Ganeswarpur - Opp.Party(s)

Sri Keshab Chandra Acharya

11 Jul 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/111/2016
( Date of Filing : 20 Sep 2016 )
 
1. Sri Samsan Mohapatra, aged 38 years
S/o. Brajanand Mohapatra, At/P.O/P.S- Sahadevkhunta, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The General Manager, NESCO, Ganeswarpur
Ganeswarpur, Balasore.
2. The S.D.O-Cum-Asst. Manager, NESCO, Supply-II, Balia
Balia, Balasore.
Odisha
3. The Junior Manager, NESCO, BED, Sec-II, Balia
Balia, Balasore.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 Sri Bikash Mohan Das, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Sri Bikash Mohan Das, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Sri Bikash Mohan Das, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 11 Jul 2023
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case record is posted today for hearing of the case. Neither the complainant nor his Advocate is present nor taken any step. Advocate for O.Ps is present and files hazira. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up.   

                                         In the present case, the notice against O.P No.1 was sufficient and the O.Ps No.2 & 3 appeared, but only O.P No.2 filed written version. As it appears from the case record, the complainant did not turn up and slept over the matter since 04.09.2018 to till today except on 15.07.2019 and no step is taken nor did his advocate used to take any step on his behalf, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the nature and conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed against the Ops is treated to be infructuous.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.