View 1081 Cases Against Max Life Insurance
View 32914 Cases Against Life Insurance
View 32914 Cases Against Life Insurance
Sri Raghava Rao Nalla filed a consumer case on 02 Jun 2014 against The General Manager, Max Life Insurance Company Ltd., in the Rayagada Consumer Court. The case no is CC/115/2014 and the judgment uploaded on 21 Dec 2019.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAYAGAD
AT: KASTURI NAGAR, Ist. LANE, L.I.C.OFFICE BACK PO/DIST: RAYAGADA , STATE:
ODISHA, PIN NO.765001, PHONE/FAX
NO.06856-223025.
C.C. Case No.. 115/ 2014.
P R E S E N T .
Sri Pradeep Kumar Dash, LL.B, President.
Smt. Ch. Nirmala Kumari Raju, LLB, Member
Vrs.
Counsel for the parties:
For the complainant: In person
For the O.P 1: Sri K.N.Samantray, Advocate, Jeypore.
For the O.P.2: Sri K.Ch.G.S.Kumudan,Advocate,Rayagada.
JUDGMENT
The facts of the complaint in brief is that the complainant is having his account with O.p 2 and he is partly blind and hearing difficulties and he is in need of assistance from anybody to put his signature on the papers. The officers of the O.p 2 asked the complainant not to keep such money in S.B. account which will get only normal interest and suggested to put the same in long term deposits but as the complainant was in need of money for different purpose he declined to the proposal of the O.p 2 but the O.p 2 and his staff managed to obtain his signature on some papers without explaining the reason for the same and ;simply stated that they need those signature for their official purpose but to the utter surprise the complainant could know that a sum of aRs.85,000/- was drawn by the O.p 2 and sent it to the O.p 1 towards the insurance ;which he never intended and the insurance papers received by the complainant is also not disclosed to him and whenever the complainant approaches they used to say that they will refund the same and again deducted Rs.15,000/- towards the insurance and all these transactions were made without his consent and knowledge. On the demand of the complainant the O.p 2 given the policy particulars long after the policy and even gone to the extent of producing a medical fitness and he has never attended before the said doctor at any time. The complainant has ask for refund of the amount and given an application which the O.p 2 received but till now the amount has not been refunded. Hence, prayed to direct the O.P to refund entire policy amount of Rs.1,00,000/- and award compensation and ;such other relief as the forum deem fit and proper. Hence, this case.
On being noticed, the O.p 2 appeared through their Counsel Sri K.Ch.G.S.Kumudan and filed written version and denied the entire allegation on all its material particulars. The O.p No. 1 appeared through their Counsel Sri K.N.Samantray but not shown their interest to file any counter in support of their claim as such the O.p 1 was set exparte. It is submitted by the O.p 2 that the complainant is an educated person and knows reading and writing English and he after knowing all the advantages of opening account in the O.p 2 ban k under the scheme and category of SB Axis Wealth, he opened the account which is ;mot privileged account and the complainant has been given free ATM service. The complainant after thoroughly going through the advantages and savings of Max life Insurance and also the broachers, he has taken the policy and neither the bank staff nor the insurance people have influenced and insisted for taking the policy and after fully satisfaction and convenience of the advantages of Max Life Insurance the complainant has drawn DD Rs.85,000/- on 24.12.13 in favour of the O.p 1 and another DD for Rs.15000/- drawn on 31.12.13. Even after payment of the 1st premium and submission of the application the insurance officers again contacted the complainant and sought his views whether he would continue or withdraw but the complainant has not informed either to the insurance officers nor the bank officials that he is not interested to continue the policy and he also never informed to any of them that he has not given any consent. It is further submitted that as per the written application before the O.p 1 for ;cancellation of policy dt.14.5.14, the policy was cancelled and the complainant received back the amount of aRs.1,00,000/.- from the O.p 1 under his savings account No.913010054578081 dt.30.5.14. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, the O.Ps are not guilty for deficiency of service and hence prayed dismiss the claim of the complainant with cost.
We perused the complaint petition and documents filed by both the parties. We perused the account statement filed by the Axis Bank and found that the O.p No.1 has already paid the claim amount of Rs.1,00,000/- to the account of the complainant on 30.5.2014 and since the Opp.Parties have refunded the claim amount of the complainant we do not feel it necessary to go into the merit of the case . The complainant has also admitted the receipt of insurance amount. Hence, it is ordered.
ORDER
Since the O.ps have already paid the claim amount of the complainant which was admitted by the complainant, we do not found any deficiency in service on the part of the O.ps and hence the complaint filed by the complainant is dismissed having no merit. There shall be no order as to costs. Parties to bear their own cost.
Pronounced in open forum today on this 14th day of July,2015 under the seal and signature of this forum.
A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements , be forwarded to the parties free of charge.
Member President
Documents relied upon:
By the complainant:
By the O.Ps:
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.