West Bengal

Hooghly

CC/128/2018

Sri Goutam Sarkar - Complainant(s)

Versus

The General Manager IDBI Tower. - Opp.Party(s)

25 Oct 2019

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HOOGHLY
CC OF 2021
PETITIONER
VERS
OPPOSITE PARTY
 
Complaint Case No. CC/128/2018
( Date of Filing : 17 Aug 2018 )
 
1. Sri Goutam Sarkar
314/D Ambagan, Naldanga 712123
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
2. Smt Sima Sarkar
Bandel
HOOGHLY
WEST BENGAL
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The General Manager IDBI Tower.
WTC Complex, Mumbai 400005
Mumbai
Maharastra
2. The Assistant General Manager
44 Shakspeare Sarani, 700071
KOLKATA
WEST BENGAL
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Shri Sankar Kr. Ghosh PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri Samaresh Kr. Mitra MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Devi Sengupta MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 25 Oct 2019
Final Order / Judgement

25.10.2019

            Record Is Put Up By The Put Up Petition Filed On Behalf Of The Complainants.  One Petition Has Been Filed On Behalf Of The Complainants Praying For Withdrawal Of The Case On The Ground Stated Therein Supported By Affidavit.

            Ld. Advocate Appears For The Complainant Has Not Pressed The Petition Dated 18.10.2019, Wherein Complainants Had Prayed For Withdrawal Of The Case.  The Said Petition Stands Rejected Being Not Pressed By The Ld. Advocate Of The Complainants.

            Ld. Advocate Appearing For The Complainants And Ld. Advocate Appearing For The Opposite Parties Are Present.  Both Of Them Submit To Take Up The Petition Of This Day For Hearing As The Matter Has Settled Outside Of This Forum.

            Accordingly The Petition Dated 25.10.2019 Of The Complainants Praying For Withdrawal Of The Case Is Taken Up For Hearing.  Heard The Ld. Advocates Appearing For The Respective Parties.  Ld. Advocate Mr. Surojit Gangopadhyay Appearing For The Opposite Parties Has Clearly Endorsed On The Margin Of The Said Petition That Opposite Parties Have No Objection If The Complaint Is Withdrawn And Opposite Parties Will Not Claim Any Cost Whatsoever In This Regard.

            Having Heard Both Sides And Going Through The Materials On Record, Specially Considering The Remarks On Behalf Of The Ld. Advocate Of The Opposite Parties  Appears On The Margin Of The Prayer, This Forum Is Of The View That Prayer Of The Complainants Should Be Allowed.  Of Course It Is Categorically To Be Noted That On The Self Same Ground Complaints Will Not Be Permitted To File Fresh Case If Any, Against The Ops In Future.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Shri Sankar Kr. Ghosh]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri Samaresh Kr. Mitra]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Devi Sengupta]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.