Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/112/2018

Mrs.Ameer Nilofar Shahanass Basheer Ahmed, Trichirapali- 620 001. - Complainant(s)

Versus

The General Manager, ETIHAD Airways, and 2 others - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.M.Baskar

26 Nov 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

C.C. No.112/2018

                         DATED THE 26TH  DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

 

 

Mrs. Ameer Nilofar Shahanass Basheer Ahmed,

D/o. Mr. S. Ameer,
Residing now at:-

No.38, Gosswell Street,

Liverpool, LI54JU,

United Kingdom.     

 

Permanent Address:

No.33, New Raja Colony,

Beema Nagar,

Trichirapalli – 620 001.

 

Through her Power Agent:

Mr. S. Ameer,

S/o. Mr. Samsudeen,

Residing at:

No.33, New Raja Colony,

Beema Nagar,

Trichirapalli – 620 001.                                                                                                                    .. Complainant.

-Versus-

1. The General Manager,

ETIHAD Airways,

Kilii Block, ITC Grand Chola,

No.63, Mount Road,

Guindy,

Chennai – 600 032.

 

2. The Station Manager,

Etihad Airways,

Office of the Etihad Airways,

Anna International Airport,

Tirusulam,

Chennai – 600 043.

 

3. The Manager,

Riya Travels,

Tabs Complex,

Bharati Dhasan Salai,

Cantonment,

Trichirapalli – 620 001.                                                                                                                     .. Opposite Parties.

 

Counsel for the complainant                  : M/s. M. Baskar

Counsel for the  opposite parties 1 & 2  : M/s. J. Rupa

Counsel for the  3rd opposite party         : M/s. Thirumaran

 

          This consumer complaint coming up before us on 26.11.2021 for appearance of both, for filing written arguments of both and for arguments (in list) and this Commission made the following order in open court:                                                      

 

Docket order

Opposite parties 1 to 3 present.  No representation for complainant. Written argument of opposite parties 1 & 2 filed today.  Today, this matter is posted for appearance of both and for filing written argument of both and for arguments (in list).   When the matter was called at 11.30 A.M., there was no representation for complainant.   Hence, the matter was passed over and again called at 01.00 P.M. the complainant was again not present, written argument also not filed.  Since the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the complaint is dismissed for default.   No cost.

 

 

                    Sd/-                                                                                                                 Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                                        R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                                          PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.