Per Mr.S.R.Khanzode, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member. Appellant in person Heard appellant in person. Perused the impugned order as well as material placed on record. This consumer complaint is in respect of alleged discontinuance of telephone connection for not paying the amount of Rs.26,602/- of bill dated 26/9/2000. Telephone connection was discontinued on 30/10/2000. Cause of action for the consumer complaint thus arose on 30/10/2000 while consumer complaint was filed on 12/3/2008. Therefore, considering the provisions of sub section 24-A of Consumer Protection Act, 1986, consumer complaint is hopelessly time barred. No application for condonation of delay is also filed. Under the circumstances on this count alone consumer complaint ought to have been dismissed, however the same is partly allowed directing O.P. to reissue the correct bill as per direction given and, further, directions were given to give particular telephone number and compensation of Rs.5000/- and cost of Rs.2000/-. in spite of this, not satisfied with the reliefs which were granted, this appeal is preferred by the original complainant. Appellant on enquiry informed us that there is no appeal preferred by the respondent/original O.P. No case is made out for enhancement or for additional reliefs and, thus, we find appeal is devoid of substance. We may also observe that appellant did not comply with the direction dated 11/9/2009 to issue notice to respondent and similarly, he did not comply with the direction dated 03/02/2010 to pay cost of Rs.2000/-. For the reasons stated above, we pass following order:- ORDER Appeal is not admitted and stands rejected. Copies of the order be furnished to the parties. | 
