Haryana

Ambala

CC/288/2013

GURMAIL SINGH - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE FORD INDIA PVT LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

SUMIT SHARMA

11 May 2016

ORDER

                                                                                                                                                       CC No.288 of 2013

                                                                 Gurmail Singh Vs. The Ford India & others.

Present:          None for complainant.

                        None for Op No.1.

                        Sh. Keshav Sharma, Adv. counsel for OP No.2.

                        Sh. Nikhilesh Bhagi, Adv. counsel for OP No.3.

                        Case called several times since morning but neither complainant nor his counsel has put in appearance. Let the case be taken up at 12.35 P.M.

                                                                          Sd/-                                              Sd/-

                                                                        Member                                 President

                                                                                                                        11.05.2016.

 

Present:          None for complainant.

                        None for Op No.1.

                        Sh. Keshav Sharma, Adv. counsel for OP No.2.

                        Sh. Nikhilesh Bhagi, Adv. counsel for OP No.3.

 

                        Case taken up at 12.35 P.M and called repeatedly but none has put in appearance on behalf of complainant.   In the interest of justice, the case be again taken up at 2.45 P.M.

                                                                            Sd/-                                         Sd/-

                                                                        Member                                 President

                                                                                                                        11.05.2016

Present:          None for complainant.

                        None for Op No.1.

                        Sh. Keshav Sharma, Adv. counsel for OP No.2.

                        Sh. Nikhilesh Bhagi, Adv. counsel for OP No.3.

                        Case taken up at 2.45 P.M. and called repeatedly but this time also neither complainant nor his counsel has put in appearance.  Perusal of file reveals that the case was fixed for evidence of complainant on 12.06.2014 and since then complainant has availed several opportunities to conclude his evidence including last opportunity but failed to conclude the same rather opted not to come present before the Forum wherefrom it is presumed that complainant is not interested in pursuing the complaint further more.  Hence, finding no justification in adjourning the case further, the same is dismissed in default for non-appearance of the complainant. Copies of this order be sent to parties concerned free of costs, as per rules.  File after due compliance be consigned to record room.  

Announced: 11.05.2016                      Sd/-                                     Sd/-       

                                                       Member                                 President

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.