Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/81/2015

Sri Chittaranjan Mohanty, aged about 33 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Federal Bank Ltd., Having its Regd. & Head Office, Kochi, Represeted by its Managing Director & - Opp.Party(s)

Sri Debi Prasad Sarangi & others

22 Aug 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/81/2015
( Date of Filing : 30 Mar 2015 )
 
1. Sri Chittaranjan Mohanty, aged about 33 years
S/o. Late Ganesh Prasad Mohanty, At- Chhatara, P.O- Turigadia, P.S- Soro, Dist- Balasore-756045. Residing At- Kamarpur, Near PHD Office, P.O- Uttareswar, P.S- Soro, Dist- Balasore-756045.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Federal Bank Ltd., Having its Regd. & Head Office, Kochi, Represeted by its Managing Director & CEO
At- Aluva, Kochi-683101.
Kerala
2. Deputy General Manager, The Federal Bank Ltd., Zonal & Regional Office, Kolkata
At- 2B, Regency 6, Hungerfold Street, Kolkata-700017.
West Bengal
3. The Federal Bank Ltd., Soro Branch, Represented by its Branch Manager
At- Anam Shopping Complex, New Cinema Road, Soro, P.S- Soro, Dist- Balasore-756045.
Odisha
4. Sri Niraj Kumar Rout, aged about 35 years
At- Darakoli, P.O/P.S- Oupada, Dist- Balasore. At Present- Branch Manager, The Federal Bank Ltd., Soro Branch, At- Anam Shopping Complex, New Cinema Road, P.S- Soro, Dist- Balasore-756045.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 22 Aug 2023
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case record is posted today for hearing of the case. Neither the complainant nor his Advocate are present nor taken any step. Advocate for Op No.3 is absent, no steps filed. Ops No.1, 2 & 4 are absent, no steps filed. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up.   

                                         In the present case, only Op No.3 is appeared & filed his written version, whereas the notices against Ops No.1, 2 & 4 were sufficient earlier. So, the Ops No.1, 2 & 4 are set ex-parte. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 26.11.2018 to till today, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the above nature and conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed against the Ops is treated to be infructuous.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.