Kerala

StateCommission

CC/13/2018

LEENA THOMSON - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE FEDERAL BANK LIMITED - Opp.Party(s)

K V JAYDEEP MENON

06 Jul 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/2018
( Date of Filing : 14 Feb 2018 )
 
1. LEENA THOMSON
KOTTILAKKATTU HOUSE, HOUSE NO- 19/933B, S.D.P.Y ROAD, PALLURUTHY.P.O, ERANAKULAM- 682006.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. THE FEDERAL BANK LIMITED
PALLURUTHY BRANCH, PALLURUTHY.P.O, ERANAKULAM, KOCHI- 682006.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SRI.T.S.P.MOOSATH JUDICIAL MEMBER
  SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 06 Jul 2022
Final Order / Judgement

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

C.C.No.13/2018

JUDGEMENT DATED: 06.07.2022

 

 

 

PRESENT:

 

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN 

:

PRESIDENT

SRI. T.S.P. MOOSATH

:

JUDICIAL MEMBER

SRI. K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN

:

MEMBER

                                   

                                   

COMPLAINANT:

 

 

 

Leena Thomson, W/o Late Dr. K.L. Thomson, Kottilakkattu House, House No.19/933 B, S.D.P.Y. Road, Palluruthy P.O., Ernakulam – 682 006

 

(by Advs. K.V. Jayadeep Menon & R. Santhosh)

 

 

Vs.

 

 

OPPOSITE PARTY:

 

 

 

The Federal Bank Ltd., Palluruthy Branch, Palluruthy P.O., Ernakulam, Kochi – 682 006

 

(by Advs. S. Reghukumar & Threya J. Pillai)

 

 

JUDGEMENT

 

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN: PRESIDENT

 

          No representation for the complainant today also.  Opposite party represented through counsel.  The counsel points out that there has been no representation for the complainant constantly for the last many postings.  We have verified the proceedings of the previous dates.  We notice that the counsel who was appearing for the complainant had informed this Commission that he had relinguished his vakalath in the matter.  Therefore, notice had been issued to the complainant at her address shown in the complaint on three occasions dated 20.03.2022, 10.03.2022 and 09.06.2022.  All the notices have been returned by the postal authorities with the endorsement “Not Known”.  The above being the statement of affairs, it is obvious that the complainant is no longer interested in prosecuting these proceedings.  This complaint is dismissed for default.

         

 

JUSTICE K. SURENDRA MOHAN 

:

PRESIDENT

T.S.P. MOOSATH

:

JUDICIAL MEMBER

K.R. RADHAKRISHNAN

:

MEMBER

 

 

SL

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI.T.S.P.MOOSATH]
JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
 
[ SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.