Orissa

Bhadrak

CC/49/2018

Laxmidhar Panda - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Executive Engineer , Electrical, NESCO, North Electrical Division - Opp.Party(s)

Sri D. Panda

06 Mar 2019

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
BHADRAK
 
Complaint Case No. CC/49/2018
( Date of Filing : 19 Jun 2018 )
 
1. Laxmidhar Panda
S/o Late Loknath Panda, Vill- Nilakanthapur, Ps- Purunabazar, Dist- Bhadrak
Bhadrak
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Executive Engineer , Electrical, NESCO, North Electrical Division
At- Bypass, Bhadrak
Bhadrak
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. RAGHUNATH KAR PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. BASANTA KUMAR MALLICK MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. AFSARA BEGAUM MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party: Sri P. K. Nayak & Others, Advocate
Dated : 06 Mar 2019
Final Order / Judgement

Advocate for O.P files hazira. Complainant took no steps. Case has been posted today for hearing on both petitions dtd.18.12.2018 filed by advocate for complainant for substitution of petitioner & petition dtd. 02.01.2019 for non maintainability of the case field by O.P. When the petition dtd.18.12.2018  field by  advocate for complainant for substitution of petitioner is taken up for hearing , advocate for complainant present in the Forum although not taken steps, submitted that the legal hires of the present petitioners are not interested to proceed with the case and as such he does not want to move the petition.  Heard both parties on the petition for substitution of complaint.  

C.P Act “13 (7)-In the event of death of a complainant who is a consumer or of the opposite party against whom the complaint has been filed, the provisions of Order XXII of the First Schedule to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) shall apply subject to the modification that every reference therein to the plaintiff and the defendant shall be construed as reference to a complainant or the opposite party, as the case may be.”

Advocate for complainant does not prefer to file legal hires certificate nor any single document relating to substitution of parties.  In absence of documents we hold that the submission of his advocate is true. As such the petition filed by advocate for complainant for substitution of party is Rejected.  In the event of death of a complainant who is a consumer is a question before us.  Prior to interring into the other issues we hold that the complaint is dismissed as present complainant is not a consumer and complaint is not maintainable.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. RAGHUNATH KAR]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. BASANTA KUMAR MALLICK]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. AFSARA BEGAUM]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.