Maharashtra

Gondia

CC/20/19

JYAYABEN ASHWINKUMAR THAKKAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER M.S.E.D.C.LTD GONDIA - Opp.Party(s)

MS. A. Y. BOKDE

12 Oct 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, GONDIA
ROOM NO. 24, SECOND FLOOR, NEW ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING,
JAYSTAMBH CHOWK, GONDIA
MAHARASHTRA
 
Complaint Case No. CC/20/19
( Date of Filing : 24 Feb 2020 )
 
1. JYAYABEN ASHWINKUMAR THAKKAR
Ring Road in Front of Dosa Hot Bajrangi Complex Gondia
GONDIA
MAHARASHTRA
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER M.S.E.D.C.LTD GONDIA
At SuryaTola Gondia Tah Gondia
GONDIA
MAHARASHTRA
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. BHASKAR B. YOGI PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. SARITA B. RAIPURE MEMBER
 
PRESENT:MS. A. Y. BOKDE, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 MR. S. B.RAJANKAR, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 12 Oct 2021
Final Order / Judgement

निशाणी क्रमांक 1 वरील आदेश

            Heard Arguments of Ld. Adv. for Complainant and Opposite Party.  Consumer dispute is regarding refund of security deposit amount.  It is the case of complainant that in 2010, she had requested the opposite party to disconnect the electric meter and refund the security deposit amount.  Accordingly, the meter was transferred from complainants name to one Utpal Neelkamal Sharma on or about 09 Jun, 2011 Doc. No. 8 at pg. No. 16 and an amount of Rs.3,090/- has been deposited by new consumer.   The Opposite Party is duty bound to refund the security deposit and they are admitting this in the written version Para No. 3 as mentioned ‘O.P. was and is ready to refund the security deposit amount immediately after receipt of original receipt of security deposit’.

            There is no document which shows that prior to filing of consumer complaint O. P. has demanded to deposit original security deposit receipt.  Hence till the amount has withheld the cause of action is continuous and has utilised till date.  Hence in the interest of justice it would be just and proper to allow the complaint with some cost and compensation.  Therefore following order:-

-:  Order :-

            1.         Complaint allowed partly.

            2.         The Opposite Party is directed to refund the security amount of Rs. 2,500/- along with interest of 10% p.a. from the            date meter is transferred to new consumer i.e. 09/06/2011 till the amount is paid.

            3.         Complainant is directed to deposit original receipt to O. P. office within 15 days of this order.

            4.         The Opposite Party further directed to pay Rs. 5,000/- as legal cost to the complainant.

            5.         Certified free copy be supplied to the parties.

            6.         Additional sets of complaint be taken back by the complainant within 30 days and file be consigned to record room.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. BHASKAR B. YOGI]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MS. SARITA B. RAIPURE]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.