Orissa

Rayagada

CC/51/2020

Sri P Narasingha Rao - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Executive Engineer Lift Irrigations Division - Opp.Party(s)

Self

15 Apr 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT   CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

POST  /  DIST: Rayagada,  STATE:  ODISHA,  Pin No. 765001.

                                                      ******************

C.C.case  No.     51     / 2020.                               Date.      9    . 4. 2021

P R E S E N T .

Sri   Gadadhara  Sahu,                                                      President.

Smt.Padmalaya  Mishra,.                                                 Member

 

Sri  P.Narasingha Rao, S/O: Late P.Venkata Rao, C/O: M.Kota Durga Rao, AT:Purnaguda, Po: P.R.Peta,  Jeypore,Dist:Koraput,  764  003  Dist:Koraput.                                                                                 …Complainant.

Versus.

 

1.The Executive  Engineer, Lift Irrigation Division, At/Po;Gunupur, Dist: Rayagada.

2.The Managing Director, O.L.I.C Ltd., Plot No.  N-17/2, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar- 761012.

3.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Janapath, Unit-IX, Bhubaneswar, 751001.

4.The Assistant Provident Fund commissioner,  Sub-Regional Office,  Pan complex,  New Bus stand road, Berhampur, Dist:Ganjam- 760001..Op.    Parties.

Counsel for the parties:                         

For the complainant: - Selt..

.For the O.P No.1 & 2  :- Sri G.Sai  Prasad, Advocate, Rayagada.

For the O.P. No. 3  & 4 :-  Sri K.Ch.G.S.Kumandan, Advocate, Rayagada.

.

JUDGEMENT

The  crux of the case is that  the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps    for  non payment of  EDLI amount and widow,  children pension bearing  EPF No.1683/1119 for which  the complainant  sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.                                                                              

                On being  noticed  the O.Ps  filed  written version  before the  District  Commission  through their learned counsels  refuting the allegations made   against them.  The O.Ps  prays the  District  Commission  to dismiss  the case against them  for the best interest of justice.

Heard arguments from the learned counsels for the    O.Ps and from the complainant.    Perused the record, documents, written version  filed by the parties. 

This  District Commission   examined the entire material on record  and given  a thoughtful consideration  to the  arguments  advanced  before us by  the  parties touching the points both on the facts  as well as on  law.

                                                                         FINDINGS.

Undisputedly   the  complainants father had worked as a Pump Driver  since 12.12.1972 and expired on Dt.12.02.1998 while  in service and  also  the complainants mother was also expired  on Dt. 13.01.2020..  Undisputedly  the complainants mother  had  already deposited  excess amount of Rs.29,436/-  paid towards  CPF final withdrawal vide  CPF account No. 1119/OLIC  on Dt. 07.07.2017  through   Union Bank of  India, Vizag.    Undisputedly the  complainant is entitled  of EDLI amount and childrens  widow pension  vide  EPF Account  No.  OR/OR/1683/1119  from the O.Ps.

The  O.P. No.1 &2 (OLIC)  in their written version  have contended that  dur to non  receipt of  documents from the complainant the same are not submitted to the  O.P. No.3 & 4 (EPF authority).

The O.Ps  3 & 4  (EPF authority) in their written version  have contended  that after receipt of the  required documents  from the O.P. No.1 & 2 (OLIC)  the complainant  will be eligible  for the same.

The complainant  during the course of hearing submitted that all the required documents have  already  submitted to the  O.P. No.1 (OLIC) as  required   by  the  O.P. No.1 (copies of the same are available  in the file)..

The District Commission  observed as the complainant has already  submitted all the required documents to the O.P. No.1(OLIC)  so  he should   transmit  the same to the O.P. No.2 (M.D., OLIC) .  In turn  the  O.P. No.2 (M.D., OLIC)  should   transmit the same to the  O.P. No.3( EPF authority ) to  get   the    EDLI amount and childrens  widow pension  vide  EPF Account  No.  OR/OR/1683/1119  by the  complainant.

To meet the ends of justice  the following order is passed.

ORDER.

                        The  O.P. NO.1 & 2 (OLIC)  are  directed  to transmit   all the    documents of the  complainant  to the  E.P.F. authority  within  one month  for sanction  of  EDLI amount and widow   children pension  bearing  EPF  No. 1683/1119   in favour of the complainant.

                        The   O.P. No. 3 &  4  (E.P.F) authority    are directed  to  sanction  the   EDLI amount and widow   children pension  bearing  EPF  A/c  No. 1683/1119  and  credit the sanction amount in the  S.B. account of the  complainant with in  3(three) months  from the date of receipt of  documents from the  OLIC authority.

                        Parties are left to  bear their  own cost.

Dictated and corrected by me. Pronounced on this  9th. Day of  April, 2021.

Member.                              President.

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.