Kerala

Ernakulam

CC/10/513

MATHEW J. CHOOLACKAL, - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KWA - Opp.Party(s)

VALSAMMA KURIAN

12 Oct 2011

ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
ERNAKULAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/10/513
 
1. MATHEW J. CHOOLACKAL,
40/1429, SONAL, PRESS CLUB ROAD, ERNAKULAM.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KWA
OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, P.H. DIVISION, COCHIN-682016.
2. THE ASST EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
WATER WORKS SUBDIVISION, PALLIMUKKU, COCHIN-682016.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONORABLE MR. A.RAJESH PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE MR. PROF:PAUL GOMEZ Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

PBEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ERNAKULAM.

Dated this the 12th day of October 2011

                                                                                                       Filed on :23/09/2010

Present :

          Shri. A  Rajesh,                                                     President.

Shri. Paul Gomez, Member.                                   Member.

Smt. C.K. Lekhamma,                                           Member

C.C. No.513/2010

     Between

Mathew J. Choolackal,                         :    Complainant

40/1429, Sonal,                                        (By Adv. Valsamma Kurian,

Press Club Road,                                     District Court, Ernakulam)

Ernakulam.

                                                And

 1. The Executive Engineer,                :    Opposite parties

     Office of the Executive Engineer,       (By Adv. Jeemon John,

     Kerala Water Authority,                        M.D.V. Complex, Opp.

     P.H. Division, Cochin-682 016.                    L.F. Hospital, Angamaly,

2. The Assistant Executive Engineer,     Counsel for the Opposite

     Water Works Sub Division,                 parties Stading  Counsel,

     Pallimukku, Cochin-682 016.              Kerala Water Authority)

 

                                          O R D E R

A  Rajesh, President.

                Complainant  absent.  No representation. O.P. represented.  It appears that the legal heirs of the complainant have no interest in pursuing the matter.  Hence the complaint dismissed for default.

Pronounced in the open Forum on this the 12th day of October 2011

                                                                        Sd/- A Rajesh, President.

                                                          Sd/- Paul Gomez, Member

                                                          Sd/- C.K. Lekhamma, Member.

                                                                   Forwarded/By Order,

 

                                                                   Senior Superintendent.

 

Copy of order despatched on :              By Post :   By Hand:

 

 
 
[HONORABLE MR. A.RAJESH]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONORABLE MR. PROF:PAUL GOMEZ]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.