Sri P.Subash filed a consumer case on 16 Nov 2017 against The Executive Engineer Electrical in the Rayagada Consumer Court. The case no is CC/24/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 24 Dec 2017.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAYAGADA,
STATE: ODISHA.
C.C. Case No. 24 / 2017. Date. 16. 11 . 2017.
P R E S E N T .
Dr. Aswini Kumar Mohapatra, President
Sri GadadharaSahu, . Member.
Smt. Padmalaya Mishra, Member
Sri P.Subash, S/O: Dr. P.Visveswar Rao, At/Po: Ukkamba, Po/Dist.Rayagada,State: Odisha. …….Complainant
Vrs.
1.The Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, Gunupur and 2 others. .…..Opp.Parties
Counsel for the parties:
For the complainant: - Sri V.R.M.Patnaik, Advocate, Rayagada.
For the O.Ps :- Deputy Manager (Law), Electrical Circle, Rayagada.
J u d g e m e n t.
The present disputes arises out of the complaint petition filed by the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service against afore mentioned O.Ps for non revision of excess electricity bill.
On being noticed the O.Ps appeared and filed reply. The O.Ps submitted that the complainant’s Meter has been defective up to July, 2014 subsequently the meter has been replaced on Dt. 10.12.2015 and the average monthly consumption recorded 10,650 units per month comes to Rs.1,24,475/- . Subsequently the aforesaid complainant has raised a dispute as per case under reference and come forward for amicable settlement with the screening committee of the Division and the above committee has decided to revise the bill on average consumption of one year i.e. 8,500 units per month and the energy charges comes to Rs.75,455/-. The O.Ps further submitted that the complainant has also paid Rs. 75,000/- vide money receipt No. 17891/ 578079 Dt. 31.3.2017. The O.Ps prayed the forum to close the case accordingly.
The learned counsel for the complainant is present before the forum and has submitted a memo to withdraw the case since as per the settlement with the O.Ps the amount of Rs.75,000/- fixed by the Deptt. has been deposited with them on Dt.31.3.2017 vide money receipt No. 17891/ 578079 Dt. 31.3.2017 and he has no more claim against the O.Ps in connection with the aforesaid case.
Heard from the parties. We perused the memo and the memo is allowed.
Accordingly the case is closed as not pressed by the complainant. Parties are left to bear their own cost.
Dictated and corrected by me
Pronounced on this 16th. Day of November, 2017.
Member. Member. President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.