Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/17/2024

Sri Harendra Singh, aged about 73 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Executive Engineer (Electrical), Jaleswar Electrical Division, TPNODL - Opp.Party(s)

Sri Baidyanath Panda & associates

11 Nov 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/17/2024
( Date of Filing : 08 Feb 2024 )
 
1. Sri Harendra Singh, aged about 73 years
S/o. Late Banamali Singh, At- Paschima Analia, P.O- Baunshadiha, P.S- Kamarda, Dist- Balasore- 756035.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Executive Engineer (Electrical), Jaleswar Electrical Division, TPNODL
At/ P.O/ P.S- Jaleswar, Dist- Balasore- 756032.
Odisha
2. The S.D.O (Electrical), Sub- Division Bhograi, TPNODL
At/ P.O/ P.S- Bhograi, Dist- Balasore- 756038.
Odisha
3. The Junior Engineer (Electrical), Section- E.S.O, Kamarda-1
At- Kamarda, P.O- Baunshadiha, P.S- Kamarda, Dist- Balasore- 756035.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 Sri Bikash Mohan Das, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Sri Bikash Mohan Das, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Sri Bikash Mohan Das, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 11 Nov 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case is posted today for hearing, as last chance to the complainant. Advocate for the complainant is absent, no steps filed. Advocate for the O.Ps is present & files hazira. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up. Perused the case record.

                                         In the present case, the O.Ps were appeared & filed w/v. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 30.03.2024 to till today and also not complied the interim order, passed by this Commission on 19.02.2024. Thus, hearing of the case impaired & the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Advocate for the complainant also not received the copy of w/v filed by the O.Ps. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is presumed that the complainant has no interest to prosecute his own case. Considering the nature & conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed against the O.Ps is treated to be infructuous.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.