Chandigarh

DF-I

Cp/126/2010

Nirmail Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

The EState officer Punjab Small Industries & export Corpn. Udyog Bhawan 18, Himalaya Marg Sector-17 - Opp.Party(s)

05 Oct 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 126 of 2010
1. Nirmail Singhson of Dayal Singh R/o HOuse No. 72 Old Roper Manimajra UT Chandigarh ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 05 Oct 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I

U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

                                                            Criminal Complaint No. 126 of 2010

                                                            in

Complaint Case No.110 of 2010

 

 

Nirmal Singh son of Dayal Singh, resident of H.No.72, Old Ropar Road, Manimajra, UT Chandigarh.                                        –          Complainant/DH

 

                        Versus

 

The Estate Officer, Punjab Small Industries & Export Corpn. Udyog Bhawan, 18, Himalaya Marg, Sector 17, Chandigarh.                                –          Opposite Party (OP)

 

 

Present:          None for the Complainant/DH.

                        Sh.Vaneesh Khanna, Advocate for OP.

                                                           

                                                            ORDER

 

                   In view of the stay order dated 3.9.2010 passed by the Hon’ble State Commission in FA No.290 of 2010, the present execution would not sustain. The execution application is accordingly dismissed as unsatisfied. The complainant would be at liberty to file fresh execution application as and when the stay order is vacated or after the decision of FA No.290 of 2010, if need be.

                        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

05.10.2010                       (MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA)                        (RAJINDER SINGH GILL)      

                                                                MEMBER                                                     PRESIDING   MEMBER             



DR. MRS MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA, MEMBER MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, PRESIDING MEMBER ,