Andhra Pradesh

Kurnool

CC/45/2005

Ameena Khatoon, W/o. Late Kareem Khan, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Elephant Beedi Factory, Rep by its Owner Mohammad Ali Khan - Opp.Party(s)

Sri T. Kumar Babu

05 Oct 2005

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/45/2005
 
1. Ameena Khatoon, W/o. Late Kareem Khan,
R/o. H.No. 54/53-66-A, Kalla Street, Kurnool
Kurnool
Andhra Pradesh
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Elephant Beedi Factory, Rep by its Owner Mohammad Ali Khan
R/o. H.No. 15-224, Kadakpura, Kurnool
Kurnool
Andhra Pradesh
2. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization,
Regional Office, Barkathpura, Hyderabad
Hyderabad
Andhra Pradesh
3. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Organization
Sub- Regional Office, Kadapa
Kadapa
Andhra Pradesh
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri.K.V.H. Prasad, B.A., LL.B PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy, B.Com., LL.B., MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt.C.Preethi, M.A., L.L.B., MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT FORUM:KURNOOL

Present: Sri K.V.H.Prasad, B.A., LL.B., President

Smt C.Preethi, M.A., LL.B., Member

Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy B.Com., LL.B., Member

Wednesday the 5th day of October, 2005

CD No. 45/2005

Ameena Khatoon,

W/o. Late Kareem Khan,

R/o. H.No. 54/53-66-A,

Kalla Street,

Kurnool.                                                               . . . Complainant

 -Vs-

1. The Elephant Beedi Factory,

    Rep by its Owner Mohammad Ali Khan,

    R/o. H.No. 15-224, Kadakpura,

    Kurnool.

2. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner,

    Employees Provident Fund Organization,

    Regional Office, Barkathpura, Hyderabad.

3. The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner,

    Employees Provident Organization,

    Sub- Regional Office, Kadapa.                          . . . Opposite parties

 

            This complaint coming on 5.10.2005 for arguments and upon the counsel for the complainant Sri T. Kumar Babu, Advocate, Kurnool not pressed the complaint, opposite party No.1 represented by Sri S.T Ali Khan, advocate, Kurnool, opposite party No.3 represented by Sri L.Viswanadham, Advocate, Kurnool and opposite party No.2 represented by in person, and after perusing the material papers on record, the Forum made the following.

 

O R D E R

 

          As complainant side endorsed not pressing the case it is dismissed accordingly.

PRESIDENT

 

          MEMBER                                                                        MEMBER

Copy to:-

  1. Sri T. Kumar Babu, Advocate, Kurnool.
  2. Sri S.T Ali Khan, Advocate, Kurnool.
  3. Sri L.Viswanadham, Advocate, Kurnool.
  4. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund-

     Organization, Regional Office, Barkathpura, Hyderabad.

 

Copy was made ready on:

Copy was dispatched on:

Copy was delivered to parties:

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri.K.V.H. Prasad, B.A., LL.B]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy, B.Com., LL.B.,]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt.C.Preethi, M.A., L.L.B.,]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.