West Bengal

Burdwan

CC/54/2018

Kailash Chand Gupta - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Divisional Manager,Burdwan Divisional Office, Shriram General Insurance - Opp.Party(s)

Pappu Gupta

04 Aug 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
166 Nivedita Pally, G.T. Road, P.O. Sripally,
Dist Purba Bardhaman - 713103
WEST BENGAL
 
Complaint Case No. CC/54/2018
( Date of Filing : 06 Apr 2018 )
 
1. Kailash Chand Gupta
Shukdal North and South Budbud PIN 713403
Bardhaman west
West Bengal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Divisional Manager,Burdwan Divisional Office, Shriram General Insurance
Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd 74(192) G.T. Road P.C. Chatterjee Market ., 3rd Floor, A Block Rambandhu Tala Asansol 713303
Burdwan
west bengal
2. The Divisional Manager kolkata Divisional office
Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd 3rd Floor 53 A, Rafi Ahmed Kidway Road Kolaktat 16
3. Shriram General Insurance Company
Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd E8 EPTP Sitapur Industrial Area Jaipur Ragasthan 302022
4. UCO Bank Budubud Branch
PIN 713403
Purba Bardhaman
West Bengal
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. MD. Muizzuddeen PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Lipika Ghosh MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Atanu kumar Dutta MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 04 Aug 2022
Final Order / Judgement

C o n s u m e r  C o m p l a i n t  No. 54 /2018.

Order No. 37

04.08.2022

 

Today is fixed for filing show cause by the complainant.   

 

Ld. Advocate for the complainant files hazira. The complainant without filing show cause files a petition for an adjournment for ex parte hearing. But none came to move the said petition on repeated calls.

On perusal of the record, it is found that the case is long pending for ex parte hearing and as the complainant did not adduce evidence-on-affidavit, he was directed to file show cause as to why the case shall not be dismissed for non-prosecution. But the complainant has filed petition for adjournment for ex parte hearing which is misconceived one and has no leg to stand upon. Accordingly, the prayer for adjournment is hereby rejected. As the complainant did not file any show cause the case should be dismissed for non-prosecution.

Hence, it is

                                                   Ordered

that this case be and same is dismissed for non-prosecution.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. MD. Muizzuddeen]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Lipika Ghosh]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Atanu kumar Dutta]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.