Tripura

West Tripura

CC/8/2023

Sri. Mangal Chakraborty. - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Divisional Manager, The United India Insurance Company Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr.S.Banik, Mr.S.Saha

09 Nov 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST TRIPURA :  AGARTALA
 
CASE   NO:   CC- 08 of 2023.
1. Sri Mangal Chakraborty,
S/O. Late Krishna Chakraborty,
Of Badharghat, Sreepally,
Madhuban, Dukli,
P.O.-Siddhi Ashram, 
P.S.-A.D. Nagar, Pin-799003,
Dist. West Tripura....................…....…...........................Complainant.
 
-VERSUS-
 
1. The Divisional Manager, 
United India Insurance Company Ltd.,
GRS Tower, 1st Floor, RMS Chowmuhani,
P.O.-Agartala, Pin-799001, P.S.-West Agartala, 
Dist.-West Tripura.…...................................................Opposite Party.
 
    __________PRESENT__________
 
 SRI GOUTAM DEBNATH
PRESIDENT,
  DISTRICT CONSUMER  
DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
      WEST TRIPURA, AGARTALA. 
 
DR (SMT) BINDU PAL
MEMBER,
  DISTRICT CONSUMER 
DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, 
  WEST TRIPURA,  AGARTALA.
 
SRI SAMIR  GUPTA
MEMBER,
  DISTRICT CONSUMER  DISPUTES  
REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
WEST TRIPURA,  AGARTALA. 
 
C O U N S E L
For the Complainant : Sri Sagar Banik,
  Sri Saikait Saha,
  Advocates. 
For the O.P. : Sri Joydeep Paul,
  Sri Jyotirmoy Das, 
  Advocates. 
FINAL ORDER  DELIVERED  ON:      09 /11/2023.
F I N A L     O R D E R
Sri Mangal Chakraborty, herein after called the Complainant, has filed this complaint against the O.P. claiming P.A. coverage of Rs.15,00,000/- as he meet with an accident on 18/10/2021 while driving his scooty bearing registration No.TR-01-AA-8373. 
2.       He was shifted to Hospital wherein he had to incur expenditure but Insurance Company denied the pay to compensation.   
 
3. Earlier the Complainant filed a case which was dismissed for non-appearance. 
4.  The O.P., Insurance Company contested the case by filing written objection. 
5.  The Complainant has submitted relevant documents including policy of insurance as stating the fact of accident and that his scooty was duly insured the O.P., Insurance Company.  
          
6.  Hearing argument the only point emerge for decision:
  I). Whether for the injuries the Complainant is entitled to any compensation under P.A. coverage?         
7. The Policy of Insurance proved that covering the date of accident the complainant had valid policy covering P.A. coverage for owner driver for Rs.15 lakhs.
    As per the terms and conditions of the policy. 
      (i) The policy holder is entitled to the entire amount that is 100% in case of death. (ii) again 100%  in case of loss of 2 limbs or sight of 2 eyes or 1 limb and sight of 1 eye (iii) loss of 1 limb or sight  of 1 eye in that case 50% of the total sum and (iv) permanent total disablement from injuries other then named in the 3 cases above. 
8. Be that as it may, there is no scope for giving any compensation for the injuries sustained by the complainant. In fact, this compulsory personal accident covering to the tune of 15 lakhs has come into force by dint of a judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in IRDA based regulation with effect from 1st September, 2018. Therefore, it is evident that in the case at hand the complainant is not entitled to any compensation for his injuries.  
9. Therefore, as per the scope of the policy of personal accident coverage the complainant has not suffered any permanent disability either 100% or 50% in terms of clause (ii) or clause (iii) or either permanent total disablement  with in the meaning of 'clause 4' of the policy. Be it made clear that under P.A. coverage,  insured is not entitled to any compensation either under pecuniary loss or non pecuniary loss as in the case of 3rd party insurance policy under the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.   10. In the result, we do not find any deficiency of service on the part of the O.P. Insurance Co. as the claim of the complainant is not legally maintainable.
  The case stands disposed off.          
  Supply a copy of this Final Order free of cost to the complainant and the Opposite party.
 Announced.
 
 
SRI  GOUTAM DEBNATH
PRESIDENT,
DISTRICT CONSUMER  DISPUTES 
REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
WEST TRIPURA,  AGARTALA
 
 
 
DR (SMT)  BINDU  PAL
MEMBER, 
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES 
REDRESSAL COMMISSION, 
WEST TRIPURA,  AGARTALA
 
 
SRI SAMIR  GUPTA
MEMBER,
 DISTRICT CONSUMER  DISPUTES  
REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
WEST TRIPURA,  AGARTALA.

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.