Sri. Mangal Chakraborty. filed a consumer case on 09 Nov 2023 against The Divisional Manager, The United India Insurance Company Ltd. in the West Tripura Consumer Court. The case no is CC/8/2023 and the judgment uploaded on 10 Nov 2023.
Tripura
West Tripura
CC/8/2023
Sri. Mangal Chakraborty. - Complainant(s)
Versus
The Divisional Manager, The United India Insurance Company Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)
Mr.S.Banik, Mr.S.Saha
09 Nov 2023
ORDER
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST TRIPURA : AGARTALA
CASE NO: CC- 08 of 2023.
1. Sri Mangal Chakraborty,
S/O. Late Krishna Chakraborty,
Of Badharghat, Sreepally,
Madhuban, Dukli,
P.O.-Siddhi Ashram,
P.S.-A.D. Nagar, Pin-799003,
Dist. West Tripura....................…....…...........................Complainant.
Sri Mangal Chakraborty, herein after called the Complainant, has filed this complaint against the O.P. claiming P.A. coverage of Rs.15,00,000/- as he meet with an accident on 18/10/2021 while driving his scooty bearing registration No.TR-01-AA-8373.
2. He was shifted to Hospital wherein he had to incur expenditure but Insurance Company denied the pay to compensation.
3.Earlier the Complainant filed a case which was dismissed for non-appearance.
4. The O.P., Insurance Company contested the case by filing written objection.
5. The Complainant has submitted relevant documents including policy of insurance as stating the fact of accident and that his scooty was duly insured the O.P., Insurance Company.
6. Hearing argument the only point emerge for decision:
I). Whether for the injuries the Complainant is entitled to any compensation under P.A. coverage?
7.The Policy of Insurance proved that covering the date of accident the complainant had valid policy covering P.A. coverage for owner driver for Rs.15 lakhs.
As per the terms and conditions of the policy.
(i) The policy holder is entitled to the entire amount that is 100% in case of death. (ii) again 100% in case of loss of 2 limbs or sight of 2 eyes or 1 limb and sight of 1 eye (iii) loss of 1 limb or sight of 1 eye in that case 50% of the total sum and (iv) permanent total disablement from injuries other then named in the 3 cases above.
8.Be that as it may, there is no scope for giving any compensation for the injuries sustained by the complainant. In fact, this compulsory personal accident covering to the tune of 15 lakhs has come into force by dint of a judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in IRDA based regulation with effect from 1st September, 2018. Therefore, it is evident that in the case at hand the complainant is not entitled to any compensation for his injuries.
9.Therefore, as per the scope of the policy of personal accident coverage the complainant has not suffered any permanent disability either 100% or 50% in terms of clause (ii) or clause (iii) or either permanent total disablement with in the meaning of 'clause 4' of the policy. Be it made clear that under P.A. coverage, insured is not entitled to any compensation either under pecuniary loss or non pecuniary loss as in the case of 3rd party insurance policy under the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988. 10.In the result, we do not find any deficiency of service on the part of the O.P. Insurance Co. as the claim of the complainant is not legally maintainable.
The case stands disposed off.
Supply a copy of this Final Order free of cost to the complainant and the Opposite party.
Announced.
SRI GOUTAM DEBNATH
PRESIDENT,
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES
REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
WEST TRIPURA, AGARTALA
DR (SMT) BINDU PAL
MEMBER,
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES
REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
WEST TRIPURA, AGARTALA
SRI SAMIR GUPTA
MEMBER,
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES
REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
WEST TRIPURA, AGARTALA.
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.