West Bengal

Kolkata-II(Central)

CC/410/2019

M/S. Pataka Industries Pvt. Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Divisional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Soumendranath Ganguly

13 Jan 2020

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
KOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)
8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,
KOLKATA-700087.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/410/2019
( Date of Filing : 27 Sep 2019 )
 
1. M/S. Pataka Industries Pvt. Ltd.
. office Pataka House,57B,Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata-700016.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Divisional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Berhampore Divisional Office,26/23/1, Sahid Surya Sen Road, Berhamporte,Murshidabad, West Bengal,Pin-742101.
2. The Regional Manager,CRO-II, National Insurance Co. Ltd.
National Insurance Building,8,India Exchange Place,P.S.Hare Street, Kolkata-700001.
3. Chairman-cum-ManagerDirector,National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Regd. office 3, Middleton Street, P.S. Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata-700071.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 13 Jan 2020
Final Order / Judgement

Order No.  05       Dated :    13.01.2020

Today is fixed for Admission hearing

Neither the complainant nor their Advocate is present on 2nd call. It is about 12.30 PM. Perused the complaint petition coupled with its annexure thereto.

 The complainant filed the instant consumer case against the Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd. Berhampur Divisional Office, Murshidabad and others on the allegation of deficiency in service in a dispute of nonpayment of claim in respect of Marine Cargo Open Insurance Policy.

On perusal of the cause title of the consumer complaint, it appears that the OP 1 is carrying on business outside the territorial jurisdiction of this Forum. The amended section 11(2) of the Act reads as follows :

(2) A complaint shall be instituted in a District Forum within the  local limits of  whose jurisdiction:-

(a) the OP or each of the OPs, where there are more than one, at the time of institution of the complaint,  actually and voluntarily  resides or carries on business or has a branch office  or personally works for  gain; or

(b) any of the OPs where there are more than one at the time of institution  of the complaint, actually  and voluntarily resides or carries on business  or has a branch office,  or personally works  for gain, provided that in such case either the permission  of the District Forum  is given or the OPs who do not reside, or carry on business  or has a branch office, or personally works  for gain, as the case may be, acquiesce in such institution  : or

(c) the cause of action wholly or in part, a rises.

Complainant filed an application dated 27.09.2019 U/s11 (2) (b) of the CP Act, 1986.

 In our considered view, that will not help the case of the complainant as the complainant obtained Marine Cargo Open Insurance Policy from OP-1/ Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd., Berhampore Divisional Office within the district of Murshidabad. It will mean that even if a cause of action has arisen in Howrah, then too complainant can file claim petition in Barasat or Krishnanagar or anywhere in West Bengal where a Registered / Regional Office of National Insurance Co. Ltd. is situated. It will lead to absurd consequences and lead to bench hunting. In our opinion, the expression Registered / Regional Office in the amended Section 11 (2) would mean the branch office where the cause of action has arisen. No doubt this would be departing from the plain and literal words of Section 11 (2) (b) of the Act.

In the present case since cause of action arose at Berhampor, within the district of Murshidabad alone will have jurisdiction to entertain the complaint.

For the reason stated herein above, we are not inclined to allow the prayer of the complainant U/s 11 (2) (b) of the C.P. Act 1986. Thus, the MA  being No.  542 of  2019  is not tenable and  rejected . Accordingly MA being No. 542  of 2019 is disposed of.

          The complaint is not admitted as this Forum have no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the complaint.

Liberty be given to the complainant to approach their grievance before the competent Forum having its territorial jurisdiction, if so desired.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Swapan Kumar Mahanty]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sahana Ahmed Basu]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ashoke Kumar Ganguly]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.