Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/207/2015

Mr.Kamalakannan, Proprietor, M/s.R.K.Enterprises - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Divisional Manager, (Claims) National Insurance Company Ltd, and anr - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. MohanKumar,

31 Mar 2022

ORDER

    STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                                           BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                              Thiru.S.KARUPPIAH                                            ::  JUDICIAL  MEMBER

                                                               Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::   MEMBER

 

                                                                                                    CC. No. 207/2015

                                                                   DATED THIS THE 31^st  DAY OF MARCH 2022

 

Mr.Kamalakannan,

Proprietor,

M/s R.K.Enterprises,

Old No. 13, New No.20,

Nethaji street,

Gandhi nagar,

Madipakkam,

Chennai – 600 001                                                                                          ..Complainant

                                                                         Vs

1. The Division Manager (Claims),

National Insurance Company Limited,

Regional Mansion 3^rd floor,

No.46, Moore street,

Chennai 600 001                 

 

2. The Assistance Manager (claims),

National Insurance Company Limited,

Regional Mansion 3^rd floor,

No. 46, Moore street,

Chennai 600 001                                                                                      ..Opposite parties 

 

Counsel for the complainant                 : M/s K.Mohan kumar

Counsel for the ops 1 and 2                 : M/s Michaeal Visuvasam

 

          This complaint is coming on before us for hearing today, for appearance of both and for filing written arguments of complainant and for arguments in list or for dismissal, we made the following order in open court :-

                                                     Docket order

          No representation for both. This complaint is posted today for appearance of both and for filing written arguments of complainant and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00A.M, the complainant was not present hence, passed over and called again at 12.45 noon, then also the complainant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The complaint is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

 

          Sd/-                                             Sd/-                                                            Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL         S.KARUPPIAH                                            R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                       JUDL.MEMBER                                            PRESIDENT