Orissa

Rayagada

CC/295/2015

Sri Sandeep Paddar, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Divisional Head IDCO,Sunabeda - Opp.Party(s)

Sri B.K Pradhan

13 Dec 2018

ORDER

DISTRICT   CONSUMER  DISPUTES REDRESSAL    FORUM, RAYAGADA,

STATE:  ODISHA.

C.C. Case  No. 295 / 2015.                                Date.   13    .        12.  2018

P R E S E N T .

Dr. Aswini  Kumar Mohapatra,                          President.

Sri  GadadharaSahu,                                             Member.

Smt. Padmalaya  Mishra,                                     Member.

 

Sri  Sandeep  Paddar, , S/O: Satyanarayana  Paddar of Calcutta-54,  State:West Bengal, C/O: Sri B.K.Pradhan, Advocate,  Po/Dist:Rayagada  (Odisha).                                                                                                                         …. Complainant.

Versus.

The Divisional  Head, IDCO, Susnabedha, Dist:Koraput.                           

                                                                                                … Opposite parties.

For the Complainant:-Sri B.K.Pradhan, Advocate, Rayagada.

For the O.P:- In person.

  1.                               .         

 

Upon  Notice, the O.P put in their appearance in person  and filed  written version in which  they refuting allegation made against them.  The above O.Ps  taking one and another pleas in the written version   sought to dismiss the complaint as it is not maintainable  under the C.P. Act, 1986. The facts which are not specifically admitted may be treated  as denial of the O.P.   Hence the O.P  prays the forum to dismiss the case against  them  to meet the ends of justice.

The O.Ps appeared and filed their written version.  Heard arguments from the  learned counsels for  the  complainant  and from the O.Ps.    Perused the record, documents, written version  filed by the parties. 

The  parties advanced arguments inter alia  vehemently opposed the complaint touching the points both on the facts  as well as on  law.

                                               

                                                         FINDINGS.

 

             During the course hearing  of the  C.C. case the learned counsel for the complainant has filed  copy of the  order of  hon’ble High Court vide case No. W.P© No. 21320/  2015 Dtd. 3.12.2015 which is marked as Annexure-I.  Further the learned counsel  for the  complainant submitted  in their  memo  that the  complainant has approached  the  Hon’ble High Court for the relief and prays the forum to close the present case.

            Perused the  order of the Hon’ble  High Court. On perusal of the High Court order this forum  observed when the case is sub-judice before the Hon’ble High Court on the same cause of action this forum has lack of jurisdiction  to continue the same before this forum. 

            From the aforesaid averments made by the complainant  it is noticed that the matter is sub-judice, pending disposal  by the Hon’ble  High Court.  In such a contingency the complainant  in the instant case  cannot seek a parallel remedy through this forum  in accordance with the judgement delivered by the Hon’ble National Commission in the case of U.Rajendran Vrs.  Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Ltd reported in CPR – 1992 (1) Page No. 504 where in the hon’ble National Commission observed “ Such filing of cases as on abuse  process of law”.  The complainant   is therefore directed to invoke the Hon’ble High Court for settlement of his claims  as the complaint on the same  subject matter  before this forum is not  maintainable.

            To meet the ends of justice the following order is passed.

                                                                        ORDER.

            In resultant the present petition  stands dismissed. Parties are left to bear their own cost.

 

            Dictated and corrected by me

                Pronounced on this            13 th.     Day of    December , 2018.

 

                Member.                                             Member.                                                              President

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.