Sri Sandeep Paddar, filed a consumer case on 13 Dec 2018 against The Divisional Head IDCO,Sunabeda in the Rayagada Consumer Court. The case no is CC/295/2015 and the judgment uploaded on 11 Mar 2019.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAYAGADA,
STATE: ODISHA.
C.C. Case No. 295 / 2015. Date. 13 . 12. 2018
P R E S E N T .
Dr. Aswini Kumar Mohapatra, President.
Sri GadadharaSahu, Member.
Smt. Padmalaya Mishra, Member.
Sri Sandeep Paddar, , S/O: Satyanarayana Paddar of Calcutta-54, State:West Bengal, C/O: Sri B.K.Pradhan, Advocate, Po/Dist:Rayagada (Odisha). …. Complainant.
Versus.
The Divisional Head, IDCO, Susnabedha, Dist:Koraput.
… Opposite parties.
For the Complainant:-Sri B.K.Pradhan, Advocate, Rayagada.
For the O.P:- In person.
Upon Notice, the O.P put in their appearance in person and filed written version in which they refuting allegation made against them. The above O.Ps taking one and another pleas in the written version sought to dismiss the complaint as it is not maintainable under the C.P. Act, 1986. The facts which are not specifically admitted may be treated as denial of the O.P. Hence the O.P prays the forum to dismiss the case against them to meet the ends of justice.
The O.Ps appeared and filed their written version. Heard arguments from the learned counsels for the complainant and from the O.Ps. Perused the record, documents, written version filed by the parties.
The parties advanced arguments inter alia vehemently opposed the complaint touching the points both on the facts as well as on law.
FINDINGS.
During the course hearing of the C.C. case the learned counsel for the complainant has filed copy of the order of hon’ble High Court vide case No. W.P© No. 21320/ 2015 Dtd. 3.12.2015 which is marked as Annexure-I. Further the learned counsel for the complainant submitted in their memo that the complainant has approached the Hon’ble High Court for the relief and prays the forum to close the present case.
Perused the order of the Hon’ble High Court. On perusal of the High Court order this forum observed when the case is sub-judice before the Hon’ble High Court on the same cause of action this forum has lack of jurisdiction to continue the same before this forum.
From the aforesaid averments made by the complainant it is noticed that the matter is sub-judice, pending disposal by the Hon’ble High Court. In such a contingency the complainant in the instant case cannot seek a parallel remedy through this forum in accordance with the judgement delivered by the Hon’ble National Commission in the case of U.Rajendran Vrs. Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Ltd reported in CPR – 1992 (1) Page No. 504 where in the hon’ble National Commission observed “ Such filing of cases as on abuse process of law”. The complainant is therefore directed to invoke the Hon’ble High Court for settlement of his claims as the complaint on the same subject matter before this forum is not maintainable.
To meet the ends of justice the following order is passed.
ORDER.
In resultant the present petition stands dismissed. Parties are left to bear their own cost.
Dictated and corrected by me
Pronounced on this 13 th. Day of December , 2018.
Member. Member. President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.