The District Telecom Engineer V/S Syed Ahmed - Consumer Court Case

Karnataka

Mysore

CPA/93/126

Syed Ahmed - Complainant(s)

Versus

The District Telecom Engineer - Opp.Party(s)

O. Sham Bhat

20 Feb 1996

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORE
No.1542/F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysore-570009.
consumer case(CC) No. CPA/93/126

Syed Ahmed						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
The District Telecom Engineer						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Complainant is absent. Advocate for opposite party appears. Heard him on the contention of parties. Complaint is filed for certain amount on the alleged grounds of deficiency of service of the opposite party. The opposite party has seriously disputed the case of the complainant. The complainant has not adduced any evidence to prove his case. Therefore the complaint is dismissed. The complainant shall pay Rs.300/- being costs of this proceedings to the opposite party.

Complainant is absent. Advocate for opposite party appears. Heard him on the contention of parties.<br /> Complaint is filed for certain amount on the alleged grounds of deficiency of service of the opposite party. The opposite party has seriously disputed the case of the complainant. The complainant has not adduced any evidence to prove his case.<br /> Therefore the complaint is dismissed. The complainant shall pay Rs.300/- being costs of this proceedings to the opposite party.